2009
DOI: 10.1002/emmm.200900002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The antibiotic ADEP reprogrammes ClpP, switching it from a regulated to an uncontrolled protease

Abstract: A novel class of antibiotic acyldepsipeptides (designated ADEPs) exerts its unique antibacterial activity by targeting the peptidase caseinolytic protease P (ClpP). ClpP forms proteolytic complexes with heat shock proteins (Hsp100) that select and process substrate proteins for ClpP-mediated degradation. Here, we analyse the molecular mechanism of ADEP action and demonstrate that ADEPs abrogate ClpP interaction with cooperating Hsp100 adenosine triphosphatases (ATPases). Consequently, ADEP treated bacteria are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
205
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
205
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The synergy of ADEPs and agonists in activating ClpP1P2 indicates that both molecules bind preferentially to functional ClpP1P2 and thus stabilize this species relative to any inactive conformations. There is substantial evidence that ADEP toxicity results from a gain-of-function mechanism in which the open axial pores of ADEP-bound ClpP allow entry and degradation of unfolded or misfolded proteins (14,15,20,21). Because we find that ADEPs both open the pores and activate M. tuberculosis ClpP1P2, it is plausible that rogue degradation of cellular proteins is also responsible for ADEP killing of M. tuberculosis (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The synergy of ADEPs and agonists in activating ClpP1P2 indicates that both molecules bind preferentially to functional ClpP1P2 and thus stabilize this species relative to any inactive conformations. There is substantial evidence that ADEP toxicity results from a gain-of-function mechanism in which the open axial pores of ADEP-bound ClpP allow entry and degradation of unfolded or misfolded proteins (14,15,20,21). Because we find that ADEPs both open the pores and activate M. tuberculosis ClpP1P2, it is plausible that rogue degradation of cellular proteins is also responsible for ADEP killing of M. tuberculosis (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…ADEPs bind to many homomeric ClpP enzymes and activate cleavage of large peptides and unstructured proteins (20,21). They also inhibit M. tuberculosis growth in the presence of effluxpump inhibitors (30), strongly suggesting that ClpP1P2 also should be an ADEP target, with toxicity resulting either from activation of rogue degradation and/or from inhibition of interaction with a AAA+ partner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The latter crystals (unlike the crystallographic studies) were grown in the presence of an ADEP antibiotic, which was bound to the ClpC1/X docking site on the apical surface of Mtb ClpP heptamers. Binding of different ADEPs has been shown to activate degradation of unfolded proteins by ClpP (28). ADEPs allosterically induce a change in binding interactions between the N-terminal ␤-hairpin and residues on the surface of ClpP, causing a reorientation of the ␤-hairpins and widening of the axial channel, which presumably allows unfolded polypeptides to pass into the degradation chamber (26,39).…”
Section: Opposite Orientations Of the Activating Dipeptide In Clpp1mentioning
confidence: 99%