2001
DOI: 10.1042/bj3610041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anti-toxin ParD of plasmid RK2 consists of two structurally distinct moieties and belongs to the ribbon-helix-helix family of DNA-binding proteins

Abstract: NMR and CD spectroscopy have been used to characterize, both structurally and dynamically, the 82-amino-acid ParD protein of the post-segregational killing module of the broad-host-range plasmid RP4\RK2. ParD occurs as a dimer in solution and exercises two different control functions ; an autoregulatory function by binding to its own promoter P parDE and a plasmidstabilizing function by inhibiting ParE toxicity in cells that express ParD and ParE. Analysis of the secondary structure based on the chemical-shift… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
25
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10 shows that, according to the criterion introduced by Uversky (51,52,54) and Uversky et al (53), the addiction antitoxins in the monomeric form have a high tendency to be partially unstructured, whereas the corresponding toxins tend to be structured even as monomers. The prediction of structuring based on the mean hydrophobicity and mean net charge of the protein polypeptide chain is in good agreement with our observations and with recently reported results on addiction modules (11,47,89,90,102). Moreover, the large amount of the random-coil form found in free antitoxins in solutions (11,47,89,90,102) represents high vulnerability for their proteolytic cleavage (25,101,103).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…10 shows that, according to the criterion introduced by Uversky (51,52,54) and Uversky et al (53), the addiction antitoxins in the monomeric form have a high tendency to be partially unstructured, whereas the corresponding toxins tend to be structured even as monomers. The prediction of structuring based on the mean hydrophobicity and mean net charge of the protein polypeptide chain is in good agreement with our observations and with recently reported results on addiction modules (11,47,89,90,102). Moreover, the large amount of the random-coil form found in free antitoxins in solutions (11,47,89,90,102) represents high vulnerability for their proteolytic cleavage (25,101,103).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, the various ParD antitoxins may bind to and inhibit the activity of their cognate ParE toxins in distinct ways. The C-terminal ParE-interacting domain of ParD RK2 is unfolded (38,39,47) and only becomes structured upon interaction with ParE. In contrast, C. crescentus ParD1, which forms a heterotetrameric complex with ParE1 in solution and in the ParD1-ParE1 crystal, is well structured in the absence of ParE1 (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Purified ParD RK2 , acting as a dimer, binds to its promoter and directly interferes with the binding of RNA polymerase (47). Since V. cholerae ParD1 and ParD2 are predicted to contain N-terminal ribbon-helix-helix DNA binding domains like that present in ParD RK2 (39), it seems probable that these V. cholerae antitoxins also directly bind and repress their respective promoters. However, the various ParD antitoxins may bind to and inhibit the activity of their cognate ParE toxins in distinct ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of the RHH family are much smaller proteins, ranging from the 45-residue CopG repressor to the 133-residue NikR from E. coli, with variations caused by additional N-or C-terminal domains (17,30). Examples of C-terminal functional regions in RHH members include protein tetramerization in the Mnt repressor, binding of the corepressor S-adenosylmethionine in MetJ, binding of the ParE toxin protein in the ParD repressor, and nickel binding by the repressor NikR (31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36). In NikR, a C-terminal nickel-binding domain is attached to an N-terminal RHH fold (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%