2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2006.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anti-coincidence detector for the GLAST large area telescope

Abstract: This paper describes the design, fabrication and testing of the Anti-Coincidence Detector (ACD) for the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST) Large Area Telescope (LAT). The ACD is LAT's first-level defense against the charged cosmic ray background that outnumbers the gamma rays by 3-5 orders of magnitude. The ACD covers the top and 4 sides of the LAT tracking detector, requiring a total active area of ~8.3 square meters. The ACD detector utilizes plastic scintillator tiles with wave-length shifting fib… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All scintillator tiles are coupled to silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) by optical fibers. The architecture of the Upper-AC detector is fully derived from the successful design of the AGILE [108] and Fermi/LAT [95] AC systems. In particular, their segmentation has proven successful at limiting the "backsplash" self-veto, therefore the dead time of the instrument.…”
Section: Anticoincidence Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All scintillator tiles are coupled to silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) by optical fibers. The architecture of the Upper-AC detector is fully derived from the successful design of the AGILE [108] and Fermi/LAT [95] AC systems. In particular, their segmentation has proven successful at limiting the "backsplash" self-veto, therefore the dead time of the instrument.…”
Section: Anticoincidence Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the AntiCoincidence Detector, ACD, of EGRET was monolithic, which caused problems above 10 GeV: electromagnetic showers in the calorimeter produced backsplash that made a signal in the ACD, thus tagging high-energy gamma rays incorrectly as charged particles. To avoid this effect, the ACD for Fermi-LAT is divided into many scintillating tiles (see Moiseev et al 2007) and, therefore, Fermi-LAT provides us with a unique opportunity to study incoming gamma rays with energies above 10 GeV. At energies below ≈10 GeV, the accuracy of the directional reconstruction of photon events detected by Fermi-LAT is limited by multiple scattering, whereas above ≈10 GeV, multiple scattering is unimportant and the accuracy is limited by the ratio of the silicon-strip pitch to silicon-layer spacing (see Atwood 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EGRET was hampered in performing detailed studies of the -ray sky above 10 GeV, due to backsplash of secondary particles produced by high-energy -rays causing a self-veto in the monolithic anticoincidence detector used to reject charged particles and due to a noncalibrated detector response. GLAST, soon to be launched, will not be strongly affected by these problems, since the anticoincidence shield was designed in a segmented fashion (Moiseev et al 2007). The effective area of GLAST will be roughly an order of magnitude larger than that of EGRET, leading to an increased sensitivity for detecting celestial -ray photons (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%