2010
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Anthropology of Secularism

Abstract: Recent debates on this topic have been heavily shaped by two paradigms: Asad's deconstructivism and Taylor's Catholic/Hegelian revisionism. This article outlines the arguments of each but frames them within the longer history of arguments that make claims for the reality of secularization and alternate sources for claims that “the secular” is a historically constructed category, including arguments from radical theology and (differently) in the anthropology of India. It is argued that implicit claims for the h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
57
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The very idea of inevitability leads a number of people and institutions to call for secularism in public life and to take action for this purpose. So, in many places, secularism has become a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy (Canell 2010). As Asad (1993) puts it, if the idea of the secular state is nothing more than a myth, an unsuccessful academic prophecy, other models-such as the group studied here-should not be interpreted as inferior, behind time, or Bnot modern. fter all, it is exactly these types of accusatory terms used against Pentecostals in Brazil.…”
Section: Contextualizing (The National Frame)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The very idea of inevitability leads a number of people and institutions to call for secularism in public life and to take action for this purpose. So, in many places, secularism has become a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy (Canell 2010). As Asad (1993) puts it, if the idea of the secular state is nothing more than a myth, an unsuccessful academic prophecy, other models-such as the group studied here-should not be interpreted as inferior, behind time, or Bnot modern. fter all, it is exactly these types of accusatory terms used against Pentecostals in Brazil.…”
Section: Contextualizing (The National Frame)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Recent works by sociologists, philosophers, and anthropologists indicate that the secular and the religious may not be as separate as the Weberian notion of disenchantment and other unilineal theories of secularization have usually implied, and that secularization theory may never have been applicable to non-Western societies [3,[35][36][37][38]. When it comes to Africa, for example, politics, which have been at the heart of the secularization debate in the West, "stubbornly resist the distinction between sacred and secular" ( [11], p. 3).…”
Section: Towards a Reflexive Postsecularismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where uncertainty and doubt are incorporated into analysis, intrinsic instabilities of belief and the malleability of intellectual and ritual commitments to one's religious traditions are often seen as problematic only in the contexts of conversion and denominational switch (Kirsch 2004) and iconoclastic rejection of ancestral and popular practices in favor of authoritative global traditions such as Christianity and Islam. In sum, anthropologists have been far more interested in belief, whether as a socially significant phenomenon in its own right or a problematized field of relations within secular contexts (Agrama 2012;Cannell 2010;Starrett 2010).…”
Section: Doubtmentioning
confidence: 99%