2013
DOI: 10.1086/671401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Anthropology of Potentiality in Biomedicine

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
93
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinic is a productive place in which to observe-as Taussig, Hoeyer, and Helmreich (2013) state in the introduction to this special issue of Current Anthropology-several "processes of becoming." Tracking these processes is valuable because they offer a site in which to observe the "articulations and practices" through which diverse participants negotiate "the task of being simultaneously biological things and human persons" in the face of moral claims that emerging medical technologies make on people's bodies (Taussig, Hoeyer, and Helmreich 2013). The social structures and material conditions at work within the clinic shape the ways that actors negotiate their relationships with one another, processes that through the lens of potentiality can be seen to work to secure an otherwise uncertain situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinic is a productive place in which to observe-as Taussig, Hoeyer, and Helmreich (2013) state in the introduction to this special issue of Current Anthropology-several "processes of becoming." Tracking these processes is valuable because they offer a site in which to observe the "articulations and practices" through which diverse participants negotiate "the task of being simultaneously biological things and human persons" in the face of moral claims that emerging medical technologies make on people's bodies (Taussig, Hoeyer, and Helmreich 2013). The social structures and material conditions at work within the clinic shape the ways that actors negotiate their relationships with one another, processes that through the lens of potentiality can be seen to work to secure an otherwise uncertain situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genotyping of the patient -achieved using a standardised technology for molecular measurement (Derksen, 2000;Keating and Cambrosio, 2005) -enables the production of genetic parameters related to the specific molecular condition of the patient. This practice bestows 'genuine plasticity' on the sample (Taussig et al, 2013): biological material extracted from the patient is transformed into something completely different and immaterial (that is, genetic variables) but at the same time is able to represent the patient itself.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, it is possible to observe that the presence of psychostimulants in the classroom is better described as the introduction of a potentiality. Thinking about psychostimulants as a potentiality entails that a highly dynamic and open-ended process must take place, a process that might lead a child to become different (Taussig, Hoeyer, & Helmreich, 2013). However, how this difference, introduced by the use of stimulant medication in the classroom, unfolds is open to different outcomes, which are dependent and rely on how stimulant medication becomes entangled with the other actors, particularly with children using it.…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Entanglementsmentioning
confidence: 99%