2019
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Anthropology of Death Revisited

Abstract: This article brings together classic work in the anthropology of death, much of which focused on funerary rites, with more recent studies, some of which continue with the classic focus and some of which introduce distinct views and problematics. The anthropology of death has become a capacious field, linking to broader debates on violence, suffering, medicine, subjectivity, race, gender, faith, modernity, and secularity (among others). In much of this work, though, we find common concerns with, and recurrent c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6 The handling and memorialisation of dead bodies are often most distressing in those cases where they are considered not to happen properly. [7][8][9][10] If the proper rites are not performed, the dead may remain both vulnerable themselves and dangerous to the living. A 'bad death', hence, is one where the appropriate process is not followed, and where the deceased is not given the dignity she is due by the bereaved.…”
Section: Summary Boxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The handling and memorialisation of dead bodies are often most distressing in those cases where they are considered not to happen properly. [7][8][9][10] If the proper rites are not performed, the dead may remain both vulnerable themselves and dangerous to the living. A 'bad death', hence, is one where the appropriate process is not followed, and where the deceased is not given the dignity she is due by the bereaved.…”
Section: Summary Boxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Verdery explains, dead bodies are "heavy symbols" (1999,127). They are the thing that is always more than a thing (Engelke 2019). This presents an opportunity to create distinction from mined counterparts, which are unable to materially embody this symbolic weight as efficiently as memorial lab-grown stones.…”
Section: Mediations: Realness Symbolic Matter and Natural Humannessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Memorial diamonds have much in common with objects of commemoration more broadly. Cultural anthropologists and (bio)archaeologists have long been interested in the connections between loss, memory, and material culture as it "mediates our relationship with death and the dead" (Hallam and Hockey 2001, 2; see also Bille, Hastru, and Soerensen 2010;Engelke 2019;Maddrell and Sidaway 2010). Memorial diamonds are by no means the first example of human remains acting as a memory artifact.…”
Section: Valuation: Likeness Reference and Semiotic Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This domain raises pressing questions about “who owns death?”; these questions lead to inquiries about sovereignty and authority (Grant, 2011 ; Bernstein, 2019 ). These cases reveal whose power counts, “who presides over the funeral, who certifies the death, who serves as custodian…,” (Engelke, 2019 ) and who can show legitimacy to “own” the body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%