2012
DOI: 10.1353/hum.2012.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Anthropologist as Witness: Humanitarianism between Ethnography and Critique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…He terms this ‘humanitarian reason’ and identifies it as a ‘general logic’ (2011, 244) governing the condition of precarity. It is a significant work, with important insights into the relationship between humanitarianism as both ‘a machine that elicits and administers testimonies’ (Guilhot , 90) and a system – a ‘moral economy’ as Fassin would have it – that is constitutive of contemporary forms of governmentality. Fassin's account of this governmental logic – if that is what it is – is ultimately a rather ahistorical one.…”
Section: Political Rationalities and Spaces Of Moral Reasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He terms this ‘humanitarian reason’ and identifies it as a ‘general logic’ (2011, 244) governing the condition of precarity. It is a significant work, with important insights into the relationship between humanitarianism as both ‘a machine that elicits and administers testimonies’ (Guilhot , 90) and a system – a ‘moral economy’ as Fassin would have it – that is constitutive of contemporary forms of governmentality. Fassin's account of this governmental logic – if that is what it is – is ultimately a rather ahistorical one.…”
Section: Political Rationalities and Spaces Of Moral Reasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recent critiques of anthropologies of witnessing and testimony suggest (Dean 2017;Guilhot 2012), the political subjectivity of witnesses does not depend on outside interpellation -either in terms of whatever status the perpetrator bestows upon them, or on documenters' decisions about whether the testimony is relevant. The common omission of the event from analytical consideration obscures the complexity of theatricality and translation, and destabilizing binaries of sincerity and play, that typifies even the most disciplined bureaucratic encounters between victim/witness and bureaucratic actors, whether NGOs or state agents (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47] Due to the focus on the individual, as opposed to community conditions, social processes are translated into the clinical language of individual suffering. [48] Analytically, "humanitarian" action can be contrasted to "development", which aims for long-term lasting improvements. [49 p1] As such, suggestions to redirect and reorganize medical missions place emphasis on achieving more congruence with the local conditions and culture, and as supports for long-term improvements [e.g., 4].…”
Section: Theoretical Background: Medical Mission Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%