2012
DOI: 10.5586/aa.2007.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anthropogenic refuge areas for bee flora in agricultural landscape

Abstract: The investigations were carried out in 2002-2006 in two municipalities of Konopnica and Jastków close to the western part of Lublin, Poland. The aim of the study was to identify the condition of bee flora and determine the floristic richness depending on the biotops in agricultural landscape. Flora of the anthropogenic refuge areas consists of 214 species, among them 80% were flow taxons. Apophytes (162 species - 78%) predominated on all types of biotops under consideration. Perennials predominated in flora of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the genus Campanula, 9 species are recorded in natural phytocoenoses in Poland [12,13]. Species from the genus Camapanula are particularly important for oligolectic bees, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the genus Campanula, 9 species are recorded in natural phytocoenoses in Poland [12,13]. Species from the genus Camapanula are particularly important for oligolectic bees, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, small plant communities in agricultural landscape, i.e. baulks, mid-field woodlots and fallows, are important refuge areas for forage vegetation [33]. These habitats increase the floristic biodiversity of these areas and simultaneously provide multispecies forage beneficial for bee development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant data were obtained from the BioFlor database [25]. The list of bee plants was established on the basis of data from literature [16,26] and according to own observations. The taxonomic system and plant nomenclature followed Mirek et al [27].…”
Section: Data Collection and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disadvantage is that road and railway constructions cause a considerable loss of natural habitats [12] and impaired environment quality, i.e., they modify microclimatic and hydrological conditions and develop dispersal barriers to many terrestrial animals [13]. However, a growing body of evidence shows that linear structures may benefit rural areas by creating important zones for general diversity of fauna [2,14] and flora [15][16][17]. The ecological value of habitats along road verges and railway embankments for pollinators is related to a number of functions, i.e., sites for nesting, mating as well as food sources for larvae and adults [3,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%