1974
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(74)90147-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The antagnism between cholinomimetic agonists and β-adrenoceptor stimulants the differentiation between functional and metaffinoid antagonism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both sets of authors recognised that their observations were consistent with earlier theoretical models of ligand interaction at receptors, referred to as allosteric or metaffinoid interactions [19]. Subsequent radioligand binding studies confirmed and extended the nature of the allosteric interaction of gallamine at muscarinic receptors [20], and an idealised form of the observations is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Muscarinic Receptor Subtypessupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both sets of authors recognised that their observations were consistent with earlier theoretical models of ligand interaction at receptors, referred to as allosteric or metaffinoid interactions [19]. Subsequent radioligand binding studies confirmed and extended the nature of the allosteric interaction of gallamine at muscarinic receptors [20], and an idealised form of the observations is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Muscarinic Receptor Subtypessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…(16) had a potency of ca 100 nM at M 1 receptors but was strongly negatively cooperative with ACh and NMS at all subtypes. In contrast, (19), was a selective and moderately potent allosteric enhancer of both ACh and NMS at M 2 receptors. It was postulated that ring E of (19) was making a specific interaction with the ACh-occupied M 2 receptor.…”
Section: Produces Modest Increases Inmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Antagonists which interact at a site which is distinct from but interdependent with the binding sites for agonists and cause a reduction in the affinity of agonists for their binding sites have been discussed by Ariens, Van Rossum & Simonis (1956;1964). Such an effect has recently been termed 'metaffinoid antagonism' (Offermeier & van den Brink, 1974). Like competitive antagonists and unlike noncompetitive antagonists of the 'mectactoid' type (Offermeier & van den Brink, 1974) Figure 5) suggesting that gallamine was reducing the affinity of atropine for its binding sites to a greater extent than it affected the affinity of ACh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an effect has recently been termed 'metaffinoid antagonism' (Offermeier & van den Brink, 1974). Like competitive antagonists and unlike noncompetitive antagonists of the 'mectactoid' type (Offermeier & van den Brink, 1974) Figure 5) suggesting that gallamine was reducing the affinity of atropine for its binding sites to a greater extent than it affected the affinity of ACh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the rabbit oviduct PGEs, which are inhibitory, antagonize the excitatory ef fects of norepinephrine and PGFs, which are excitatory, antagonize the inhibitory effect of isoproterenol [95]. The most likely explanation is functional or physiological antagonism, similar to that of the antagonism of cholinergically-induced contractions by isoproterenol [75], Antagonism probably resides in opposite effects on ionic permeabilities or calcium bind ing. Despite speculation about the role of prostaglandins in modulating autonomic function, information concerning temporal relationships and sites of synthesis is lacking.…”
Section: Interrelationships Of Catecholamines and Prostaglandinsmentioning
confidence: 99%