2013
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00508.2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Anrep effect: 100 years later

Abstract: Myocardial stretch elicits a rapid increase in developed force, which is mainly caused by an increase in myofilament calcium sensitivity (Frank-Starling mechanism). Over the ensuing 10-15 min, a second gradual increase in force takes place. This slow force response to stretch is known to be the result of an increase in the calcium transient amplitude and constitutes the in vitro equivalent of the Anrep effect described 100 years ago in the intact heart. In the present review, we will update and discuss what is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
89
0
26

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
8
89
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained when this technique was used to silence the NHE1 by direct injection of a naked interference RNA in the left ventricular wall. 10 Because we have previously shown that the SFR to myocardial stretch is the mechanical counterpart of an autocrine/ paracrine mechanism triggered by the release of endogenous angiotensin II (Ang II) involving MR and NHE1 activation, 11 we decided to functionally test the MR under our experimental conditions by exploring the SFR and NHE1 activation after stretching isolated papillary muscles from l-shMR-and control-injected hearts. The stretching of the papillary muscles in the control group promoted the characteristic biphasic mechanical response, an initial abrupt force increase followed by the SFR (Figure 3A-3C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were obtained when this technique was used to silence the NHE1 by direct injection of a naked interference RNA in the left ventricular wall. 10 Because we have previously shown that the SFR to myocardial stretch is the mechanical counterpart of an autocrine/ paracrine mechanism triggered by the release of endogenous angiotensin II (Ang II) involving MR and NHE1 activation, 11 we decided to functionally test the MR under our experimental conditions by exploring the SFR and NHE1 activation after stretching isolated papillary muscles from l-shMR-and control-injected hearts. The stretching of the papillary muscles in the control group promoted the characteristic biphasic mechanical response, an initial abrupt force increase followed by the SFR (Figure 3A-3C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have obtained evidence to propose that the SFR is the mechanical expression of a stretch-triggered autocrine/paracrine loop of intracellular signals that involves an increased production of ROS, activation of the redox-sensitive kinase cascade of MEK-ERK1/2-p90RSK, and the consequent phosphorylation (activation) of the cardiac Na ϩ /H ϩ exchanger (NHE1) (for review see Ref. 23). …”
Section: The Anrep Effect: a Redox-sensitive Phenomenon (Presented Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Frank-Starling mechanism has been well established for over a century, the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not well resolved. At the cellular level, a sustained increase in sarcomere length results in both an immediate and a secondary, slower, increase in twitch force that develops over several minutes (2). The latter phase, termed the slow force response, is caused by an alteration in cardiac myocyte Ca 2ϩ homeostasis induced by a strain-dependent mechanism that, too, is incompletely understood (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the cellular level, a sustained increase in sarcomere length results in both an immediate and a secondary, slower, increase in twitch force that develops over several minutes (2). The latter phase, termed the slow force response, is caused by an alteration in cardiac myocyte Ca 2ϩ homeostasis induced by a strain-dependent mechanism that, too, is incompletely understood (2). Existing data, mostly derived from permeabilized isolated myocardium, strongly supports the notion that the immediate increase in twitch force development upon stretch is directly due to an increase in the Ca 2ϩ responsiveness of the cardiac contractile apparatus itself (3,4), a phenomenon termed myofilament length-dependent activation (LDA) 2 (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%