1982
DOI: 10.2307/4312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Annual Food Consumption and Prey Preferences of Pike (Esox lucius) in the River Frome, Dorset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
122
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
122
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean length of prey fish increased significantly with the size of pike in this lake. Findings in this study are consistent with previous studies (Mann, 1982: Little et al 1998Wysujavk et al 2001;Amundsen et al, 2003). Besides, Liao et al (2002) indicated that large pike tended to consume large prey fish in Spirit Lake.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean length of prey fish increased significantly with the size of pike in this lake. Findings in this study are consistent with previous studies (Mann, 1982: Little et al 1998Wysujavk et al 2001;Amundsen et al, 2003). Besides, Liao et al (2002) indicated that large pike tended to consume large prey fish in Spirit Lake.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast, Chapman et al (1989) indicated that foraging on invertebrates was not limited to smaller pike and instead that invertebrates were found in the stomach of 24-60 cm standard body length pike from several lakes in Canada. The several studies also found size-related changes in the feeding of different pike populations (Mann, 1982;Eklöv & Hamrin, 1989;Sammons et al 1994;Kangur & Kangur, 1998;Çubuk et al 2006). This change based on length may be result from maximum energy requirement and gape-size limited in predator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aforementioned predatory fishes are considered as typical opportunists, very flexible in their feeding habits, capable of changing their diet spectra rapidly in response to changes in the abundance and vulnerability of available prey (Mann 1982;Chapman, Mackay 1984;Adams 1991;Beaudoin et al 1999;Brylińska 2000). They usually focus their feeding effort on the most abundant and easy to catch prey available in the environment, according to the optimal foraging theory (Werner, Hall 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cannibalism of younger (smaller) individuals by older (larger) conspecifics (intercohort cannibalism) is the most common form of cannibalism in fishes (Smith and Reay, 1991). For species with potential for intercohort overlap in habitat use, cannibalism rates may have important management implications (e.g., Mann, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%