2014
DOI: 10.1108/ijmf-08-2012-0094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The announcement and implementation reaction to China's margin trading and short selling pilot programme

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the announcement and implementation of short sales and margin trading regulation affects Chinese stock returns and trading volume. On 31 March 2010, the Chinese regulators launched a pilot programme, allowing short sales and margin trading for 50 Shanghai Stock Exchange and 40 Shenzhen Stock Exchange stocks. Design/methodology/approach – This paper uses an event study approach to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative cumulative return is persistent and not followed by any evident reversal, consistent with the results in Table 2. In summary, stock returns realized upon the implementation of short-selling and margintrading tend to be negative. Sharif et al (2012) report consistent evidence when examining the returns for a subset of 90 addition events in the first batch on March 31, 2010. The results confirm our conjecture that, although both short-selling and margin-trading were banned before the event, the constraint on short-selling was more binding.…”
Section: Event Day Returnsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The negative cumulative return is persistent and not followed by any evident reversal, consistent with the results in Table 2. In summary, stock returns realized upon the implementation of short-selling and margintrading tend to be negative. Sharif et al (2012) report consistent evidence when examining the returns for a subset of 90 addition events in the first batch on March 31, 2010. The results confirm our conjecture that, although both short-selling and margin-trading were banned before the event, the constraint on short-selling was more binding.…”
Section: Event Day Returnsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This study is complementary to Sharif et al (2012a,b). Sharif et al (2012b) investigate the market reaction to the addition event of the first batch of 90 stocks to the designated list in March 2010 in China. They find negative abnormal returns on both the announcement and implementation days, supporting Miller's (1977) overvaluation hypothesis.…”
Section: Short-selling Activity and Returnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… A MSCI research bulletin also considers this event from the perspective of A‐H share premiums, while Wang () considers informed trading around the introduction of Chinese margin trading, Wang () looks at the link between idiosyncratic risk and returns around the implementation of the Chinese regulation, and Sharif et al . () examine the announcement and implementation of the regulation change using an event study approach. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%