2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anisotropy of laser melting deposition additive manufacturing Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si titanium alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the most significant property anisotropy was noticed in the ductility data, which was much worse when measured in the horizontal direction. Zhu et al [14] in their review about laser metal deposition (LMD) of Ti alloy point out that for some authors, the as-deposited samples exhibited higher strength and lower ductility at the longitudinal direction compared to the transverse direction, although they found themselves and from other publications diverging results. As property anisotropy is undesirable, layer building strategies on the mechanical properties of printed part have been the main focus of several works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the most significant property anisotropy was noticed in the ductility data, which was much worse when measured in the horizontal direction. Zhu et al [14] in their review about laser metal deposition (LMD) of Ti alloy point out that for some authors, the as-deposited samples exhibited higher strength and lower ductility at the longitudinal direction compared to the transverse direction, although they found themselves and from other publications diverging results. As property anisotropy is undesirable, layer building strategies on the mechanical properties of printed part have been the main focus of several works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive study has been performed on these alloys in terms of structural integrity (e.g. porosity) [3][4][5], geometric integrity [3], microstructure [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], residual stress [15], distortion [3,15], mechanical properties and anisotropy [3,5,10,12] and the influence of laser processing condition and post-build heat treatment and hot isostatic pressing [3,5,16]. Throughout these studies, it is well understood that these alloys are liable to development of porosity especially lack-of-fusion pores at the inter-layer boundaries during DLD which are blamed for tensile anisotropy [3,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of their unique assets, additive manufacturing technologies also suffer from major drawbacks when compared to traditional construction methodologies: at first, they are not scalable, contrary to, for instance, casting techniques where the mold, once it is constructed, can serve to produce quickly and efficiently thousands of copies of the desired component. What's more, because of the specific path followed by the printing nozzle or laser, the material properties of parts produced by additive manufacturing methods are not precisely controlled, and many ongoing studies aim at quantifying the induced anisotropic behavior; see for instance [1,46].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%