1972
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/5/9/317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anisotropic thermal expansivity of oriented Perspex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We emphasize the impact of the CTE anisotropy by comparing the anisotropic and isotropic CTE best-fit cases in the blue solid and dashed lines, respectively, as shown in Figure . Assuming isotropic characteristics, the CTE is estimated to be 17.30 × 10 –6 ± 1.60 × 10 –6 K –1 , which is comparable to that with a similar molecular weight, ranging from ∼55 × 10 –6 to ∼100 × 10 –6 K –1 for bulk , and thin films. ,,, The out-of-plane CTE, in-plane CTE, and CTE anisotropy of thin PMMA film are estimated to be 1.48 × 10 –6 ± 0.13 × 10 –6 K –1 , 29.90 × 10 –6 ± 2.60 × 10 –6 K –1 , and 0.050 ± 0.002, respectively. The best-fit anisotropic CTE with R 2 of ∼0.97 shows a reasonable match with the experimental data within the measurement uncertainty, while the best-fit for isotropic CTE only shows R 2 of ∼0.73.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We emphasize the impact of the CTE anisotropy by comparing the anisotropic and isotropic CTE best-fit cases in the blue solid and dashed lines, respectively, as shown in Figure . Assuming isotropic characteristics, the CTE is estimated to be 17.30 × 10 –6 ± 1.60 × 10 –6 K –1 , which is comparable to that with a similar molecular weight, ranging from ∼55 × 10 –6 to ∼100 × 10 –6 K –1 for bulk , and thin films. ,,, The out-of-plane CTE, in-plane CTE, and CTE anisotropy of thin PMMA film are estimated to be 1.48 × 10 –6 ± 0.13 × 10 –6 K –1 , 29.90 × 10 –6 ± 2.60 × 10 –6 K –1 , and 0.050 ± 0.002, respectively. The best-fit anisotropic CTE with R 2 of ∼0.97 shows a reasonable match with the experimental data within the measurement uncertainty, while the best-fit for isotropic CTE only shows R 2 of ∼0.73.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Assuming isotropic characteristics, the CTE is estimated to be 17.30 × 10 −6 ± 1.60 × 10 −6 K −1 , which is comparable to that with a similar molecular weight, ranging from ∼55 × 10 −6 to ∼100 × 10 −6 K −1 for bulk 38,39 and thin films. 24,29,34,40 The outof-plane CTE, in-plane CTE, and CTE anisotropy of thin PMMA film are estimated to be 1.48 × 10 −6 ± 0.13 × 10 −6 K −1 , 29.90 × 10 −6 ± 2.60 × 10 −6 K −1 , and 0.050 ± 0.002, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Swelling experiments were carried out with the thermal expansion apparatus which has been used before with composites (6,7), and which is fully described in reference (8). The apparatus was modified and adapted to measure swelling strains as described schematically in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%