2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anisotropic characteristics of natural fibrous sepiolite as revealed by contact angle, surface free energy, AFM and molecular dynamics simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To specifically quantify the wettability, contact angle and surface free energy (SFE) are the most commonly used indicators [9]. Contact angle is a quick and convenient indicator to evaluate the wettability between test liquid and solid surface [10]. When the contact angle is 0 • , the liquid completely infiltrates the solid surface; when the contact angle is 180 • , the liquid is spherical on the solid surface and the liquid completely un-infiltrated the solid surface; when the contact angle is between 0 • and 90 • , it is considered to be hydrophilic; when the contact angle is between 90 • and 180 • , it is considered to be hydrophobic [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To specifically quantify the wettability, contact angle and surface free energy (SFE) are the most commonly used indicators [9]. Contact angle is a quick and convenient indicator to evaluate the wettability between test liquid and solid surface [10]. When the contact angle is 0 • , the liquid completely infiltrates the solid surface; when the contact angle is 180 • , the liquid is spherical on the solid surface and the liquid completely un-infiltrated the solid surface; when the contact angle is between 0 • and 90 • , it is considered to be hydrophilic; when the contact angle is between 90 • and 180 • , it is considered to be hydrophobic [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 1, it can be seen that the sepiolite nanofibers after modification with the coupling agent ( -(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyltrimethoxysilane) addition amount of 5% have the lowest surface free energy. When powders are dispersed into media, the lower the surface free energy, the better their dispersion [30][31][32]. According to the above analysis, 5% is selected as the coupling agent ( -(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyltrimethoxysilane) addition amount for the sepiolite nanofibers in order to obtain the best modification effect of sepiolite nanofibers and the optimal properties of composite materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar mode (3420 cm -1 ) was reported by Giustetto et al (2011b) in a sepiolite + indigo (2 wt %) composite heated at 150 °C in vacuum, and attributed to structural OH2 perturbed by H-bonds with the incorporated dye. In the present study, the band tentatively result from unspecific interactions existing between structural OH2 at the tunnel edges and superficial grooves (Benli et al, 2012) and the almost continuous hydrocarbons film covering most fibrils.…”
Section: Fourier Transform Ir Spectroscopy (Insert Figure 7)mentioning
confidence: 92%