The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/9/093056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The angular- and crystal-momentum transfer through electron–phonon coupling in silicon and silicon-carbide: similarities and differences

Abstract: Electron-phonon scattering has been studied for silicon carbide (6H-SiC) with resonant inelastic x-ray scattering at the silicon 2p edge. The observed electron-phonon scattering yields a crystal momentum transfer rate per average phonon in 6H-SiC of 1.8 fs −1 while it is 0.2 fs −1 in crystalline silicon. The angular momentum transfer rate per average phonon for 6H-SiC is 0.1 fs −1 , which is much higher than 0.0035 fs −1 obtained for crystalline silicon in a previous study. The higher electron-phonon scatterin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We established previously in semiconductors how the angular momentum transfer scattering rate R ( T ) can be deduced from the evolution of valence to core-hole decay peaks with temperature 23,24 as:where τ core − hole is the core-hole lifetime of the excited state, A inc = A cold − A hot (purple hatched area in Fig. 2(a)) is the fraction of decay modified by electron-phonon scattering and A coh = A cold is the fraction not affected by this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We established previously in semiconductors how the angular momentum transfer scattering rate R ( T ) can be deduced from the evolution of valence to core-hole decay peaks with temperature 23,24 as:where τ core − hole is the core-hole lifetime of the excited state, A inc = A cold − A hot (purple hatched area in Fig. 2(a)) is the fraction of decay modified by electron-phonon scattering and A coh = A cold is the fraction not affected by this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The former is caused by lattice distortions due to the core excited state. The latter is proportional to the phonon population and thus, to the Bose-Einstein distribution 24 . Therefore, the evolution of the electron-phonon transfer rate with temperature can be written as:where C indep and C dep correspond to the temperature independent and the temperature dependent contribution, respectively, and are used as fitting parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the well-defined symmetry and local nature of the x-ray addressed core states, whereas optical processes target valence transitions, often involving strongly hybridised states with mixed character. Nevertheless, x-ray excitation is a rather strong distortion of the system and subsequent vibrational coupling enables dipole forbidden electronic transitions [32,33].…”
Section: X-ray/optical Sum-frequency Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we present the experimental determination of the el-ph scattering rates at the nickel and iron atoms in the two different alloys Fe 20 Ni 80 and Fe 50 Ni 50 as well as in pure nickel. Our method is based on the core-hole clock method, where the core-hole lifetime is used as a time reference to deduce the timescale of dynamic processes like the el-ph scattering timescale [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] . Following the stringent dipole selection rules, scattered electrons do not participate to the core-hole decay in the case of e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%