2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ancient evolutionary origins of Scleractinia revealed by azooxanthellate corals

Abstract: BackgroundScleractinian corals are currently a focus of major interest because of their ecological importance and the uncertain fate of coral reefs in the face of increasing anthropogenic pressure. Despite this, remarkably little is known about the evolutionary origins of corals. The Scleractinia suddenly appear in the fossil record about 240 Ma, but the range of morphological variation seen in these Middle Triassic fossils is comparable to that of modern scleractinians, implying much earlier origins that have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
178
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(48 reference statements)
9
178
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various degrees of incongruence between morphological and molecular phylogenies are seen at all taxonomic levels, but the most striking is found at the subordinal level. While five suborders are recognised in the most widely-accepted morphological scheme (Wells 1956), only three main clades at the deepest nodes-"basal", "complex" and "robust"-have been recovered based on molecular analyses (Romano and Palumbi 1996;Kitahara et al 2010b;Stolarski et al 2011;Huang 2012). Nearly every genetic locus tested to date supports these latter groupings.…”
Section: Integrating Molecular and Morphological Evidencementioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various degrees of incongruence between morphological and molecular phylogenies are seen at all taxonomic levels, but the most striking is found at the subordinal level. While five suborders are recognised in the most widely-accepted morphological scheme (Wells 1956), only three main clades at the deepest nodes-"basal", "complex" and "robust"-have been recovered based on molecular analyses (Romano and Palumbi 1996;Kitahara et al 2010b;Stolarski et al 2011;Huang 2012). Nearly every genetic locus tested to date supports these latter groupings.…”
Section: Integrating Molecular and Morphological Evidencementioning
confidence: 75%
“…The 28S rDNA (Chen et al 1995;Cuif et al 2003), 16S rDNA Palumbi 1996, 1997;Le Goff-Vitry et al 2004;Kitahara et al 2010a), 12S rDNA (Chen et al 2002), combined 16S rDNA and 28S rDNA (Romano and Cairns 2000), combined cytochrome b and COI, as well as β-tubulin (Fukami et al 2008) all support the split between the "complex" and "robust" clades. The sister relationship between the "basal" clade and the rest of Scleractinia has been recovered by 12S rDNA, COI, 28S rDNA (Kitahara et al 2010b;Stolarski et al 2011), and most other mitochondrial loci (Huang 2012;Huang andRoy 2013, 2015;Kitahara et al 2014;Lin et al 2014). To date, no morphological characters associated with the hard skeleton have been found to correlate directly with the molecular splits.…”
Section: Integrating Molecular and Morphological Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, PD has been shown to poorly capture trait or functional diversity [19,103] especially on a regional scale [44,45]. More importantly, the most recent common ancestor of modern reef corals probably lived about 400 million years ago in the Palaeozoic [58], and many major coral lineages are relatively old [36]. Given their long history it is likely that some of the old lineages (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used BEAST 1.8 [55][56][57] to fit the DNA sequence data mentioned above onto the supertree topology using fossil node calibrations detailed in Stolarski et al [58]. These calibrations date the origins of Caryophyllia to the Oxfordian (Late Jurassic), Dendrophylliidae to the Barremian (Early Cretaceous) and Flabellum to the Campanian (Late Cretaceous).…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Phylogenetic Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%