The anatomy of risk: A quantitative investigation into injection drug users' taxonomy of risk attitudes and perceptions.

Abstract

The authors report on the first study to use the systematic quantitative methods of the psychometric paradigm of risk analysis to examine risk perceptions among substance abusers. Fifty opioid-dependent injection drug users (IDUs) and 50 matched, control individuals completed a series of measures to provide quantitative representations of risk perceptions about 53 risk-laden items (including activities, substances, technologies, and diseases). Results indicated that risk perceptions of IDUs and controls were highly correlated on many items; however, IDUs perceived several items, such as hepatitis, HIV, handguns, and unprotected sex, as markedly more risky. IDUs also perceived both themselves and others as having greater risk of contracting hepatitis and HIV. IDUs wanted significantly reduced regulation of drugs, including prescription drugs, heroin, valium, and barbiturates. Factor analyses conducted to understand how risk ratings related to various characteristics that have been shown to influence risk perception revealed 3 factors that account for approximately 80% of the variability in risk perception across groups: Factor 1, related to the severity of the risk; Factor 2, related to the certainty of the risk; and Factor 3, related to the immediacy of the risk. However, IDUs more strongly associated the extent to which they were personally affected by a risk item and the extent to which the risk affected fewer or more people to Factor 1, whereas control participants more strongly associated these characteristics with Factor 2. Identifying improved methodologies for evaluating the risk perceptions of IDUs may be of considerable utility in understanding their high-risk behavior.

Risk-taking in schizophrenia and controls with and without cannabis dependence

“…We expected more self-mastery and optimistic bias in this group because we hypothesized these factors would help explain continued cannabis use despite the likelihood of negative consequences. However, a study of optimistic bias in injection drug users showed no difference from controls for most imagined outcomes and that bias is actually less pronounced for potentially negative effects related to drug use (i.e., people using drugs agree that they are more vulnerable to negative outcomes from activities like unprotected sex compared to others (Marsch et al, 2007)). This study and our own results indicate that increased optimistic bias is not necessary for continued drug use and that bias among those with drug dependence may not differ from healthy controls in most instances.…”

Bringing the bedside to the bench, and then to the community: a prospectus for intervention research in late‐life anxiety disorders

“…As LLAD lie at the intersection of stress and aging, agents that affect aging pathways (e.g. caloric restriction mimetics [Westphal et al ., 2007], superoxide dismutase mimetics [Quick et al ., 2008], CRF1 antagonists [Ising and Holsboer, 2007]) may pre-empt the adverse consequences of LLAD.…”

Neural Correlates of Speeded as Compared with Delayed Responses in a Stop Signal Task: An Indirect Analog of Risk Taking and Association with an Anxiety Trait

“…This alternative aspect of impulsivity or the readiness to ''take risk''-is a complex psychological process that contributes to the make up of human personality (Evenden 1999). Individuals show great variation in their propensity to take risk Galvan et al 2007;Marsch et al 2007). Although impulsive behaviors are mostly known to be associated with negative consequences, ''risk taking'' may have conferred distinct advantage in reproductive success in nonhuman primates (Berard et al 1993;Mehlman et al 1995).…”