1976
DOI: 10.1017/s0022278x00053349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Anatomy of Influence: decision making in international organizations by Robert W. Cox, Harold K. Jacobson et al. New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1973. Pp. xiii+ 497. £6.50.

Abstract: The present book, which has been prepared under the auspices of the Committee on International Organisations of the U.S. Social Science Research Council, is essentially a collective effort by a group of American and British scholars. There are two methodological chapters which govern the systematic and common approach to how decisions are made in eight organisations, and a concluding synthesis. The organisations covered are the International Telecommunications Union (I.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their difference is both practically and theoretically grounded, and their collaboration in practice is of particular importance (Aall et al, 2000;Reimann, 2006;Steffek, 2013). International organizations are often closely guided by the policies of cabinets or chief executives (Keohane and Nye, 1974) and formation of these policies are a product of negotiations analyzed through a totally different perspective (Barnett and Finnemore, 1999;Cox and Jacobson, 1976;Peterson, 1995;Raftopoulos, 2005Raftopoulos, , 2001. Also, within international organizations there is often a considerable democratic deficit which shifts the dynamics into an entirely different path of inter-governmental negotiations; democracy is not transferable to the international realm thus weakening formal governance structures (Dahl, 1999;Nye and Donahue, 2000, p. 24).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their difference is both practically and theoretically grounded, and their collaboration in practice is of particular importance (Aall et al, 2000;Reimann, 2006;Steffek, 2013). International organizations are often closely guided by the policies of cabinets or chief executives (Keohane and Nye, 1974) and formation of these policies are a product of negotiations analyzed through a totally different perspective (Barnett and Finnemore, 1999;Cox and Jacobson, 1976;Peterson, 1995;Raftopoulos, 2005Raftopoulos, , 2001. Also, within international organizations there is often a considerable democratic deficit which shifts the dynamics into an entirely different path of inter-governmental negotiations; democracy is not transferable to the international realm thus weakening formal governance structures (Dahl, 1999;Nye and Donahue, 2000, p. 24).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%