2009
DOI: 10.1671/039.029.0329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anatomy and systematics ofColepiocephale lambei(Dinosauria: Pachycephalosauridae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypertrophied nodes indicative of a parietosquamosal node row are absent on the parietal. The dorsal surface of the parietal is slightly depressed above of the posterior region of the temporal chambers, as in Sphaerotholus goodwini and Prenocephale prenes, but it lacks a stepped transition to a prominent parietosquamosal shelf, as in Colepiocephale lambei 29 and variably present in Stegoceras validum 24,30 . The lateral profile of the parietal suggests a weakly developed parietosquamosal shelf intermediate in morphology between the horizontal posteromedian extension of the parietal of Stegoceras validum and the smoothly rounded parietal morphology (sometimes referred to as 'down-turned') of Sphaerotholus and Prenocephale 24,25 .…”
Section: Dinosauriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypertrophied nodes indicative of a parietosquamosal node row are absent on the parietal. The dorsal surface of the parietal is slightly depressed above of the posterior region of the temporal chambers, as in Sphaerotholus goodwini and Prenocephale prenes, but it lacks a stepped transition to a prominent parietosquamosal shelf, as in Colepiocephale lambei 29 and variably present in Stegoceras validum 24,30 . The lateral profile of the parietal suggests a weakly developed parietosquamosal shelf intermediate in morphology between the horizontal posteromedian extension of the parietal of Stegoceras validum and the smoothly rounded parietal morphology (sometimes referred to as 'down-turned') of Sphaerotholus and Prenocephale 24,25 .…”
Section: Dinosauriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the frontoparietal increases in size, the dome becomes relatively thicker and wider posteriorly, resulting in the distinctive pear-shaped dome that characterizes Stegoceras . A similar growth pattern may also characterize Colepiocephale , given the similar shape of its cranial dome [5]. These growth-related changes in the proportions of the frontoparietal suggest that the use of frontoparietal ratios in systematic assessments of specimens and in phylogenetic analyses [17] should be considered carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These two morphological types have been recognized as separate clades: the flat-headed Homalocephalidae and the domed Pachycephalosauridae [2]–[4]. Other studies, including most recent phylogenetic analyses, do not recognize Homalocephalidae and instead the flat-headed taxa are found to form successive sister taxa to Pachycephalosauridae, which remain a monophyletic group [1], [5][10]. Despite this, placement of flat-headed and domed pachycephalosaurs into separate taxa may not always be accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We divided the data into intermontane (n = 2), alluvial (n = 9) and coastal plain (n = 11) palaeoenvironments primarily using the classification scheme of Sampson & Loewen (2005. However, the Foremost Formation was reclassified as a coastal plain deposit because most fossils derive from its coastally influenced upper unit (Peng et al 2001;Brinkman et al 2004;Schott et al 2009;Ryan et al 2012). We tested for equal distribution of pachycephalosaurid remains across palaeoenvironments using chi-squared tests and for differences in relative abundance between palaeoenvironments using Kruskal-Wallis tests.…”
Section: Relative Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphology of this structure has proved crucial to both pachycephalosaurid systematics and phylogenetics (e.g. Williamson & Carr 2003;Sullivan 2003Sullivan , 2006Marya nska et al 2004;Schott et al 2009;Schott & Evans 2012;Evans et al 2013a). The majority of pachycephalosaurids are known from isolated domes, the common preservation of which has been hypothesized to result from their taphonomically resistant nature (Dodson 1983;Evans et al 2013a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%