The anatomical relationship between the roots of erupted permanent teeth and the mandibular canal: a systematic review

Puciło, Michał; Lipski, Mariusz; Sroczyk-Jaszczyńska, Magdalena; Puciło, Aleksandra; Nowicka, Alicja

doi:10.1007/s00276-019-02404-7

Cited by 11 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Using CBCT images, Kosumarl et al found that mesial root of the first molar had the greatest average distance from mandibular canal, while the shortest was in distal root of second molar, both in persons with normal skeletal jaw ratio or skeletal open bite [20]. With the exception of the third molar, Pucilo et al concluded in a systematic review that distal root of the second molar was closest to the mandibular canal, which coincided with the results of our study [21]. Littner et al measured the average values of the distance from the apex of first and second molars from the canal on radiographic images of the cadaver and they were between 3.50 and 5.40 mm, and according to a study conducted by Kovisto et al on CBCT images, these average values were between 1.51 and 3.43 mm [22,23].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cbct analysis of apical distance between second lower premolars, first and second lower molars and mandibular canal

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. Mandibular canal with the associated neurovascular bundle may be closely related to the apices of mandibular teeth. In order to avoid injuries and damages to the inferior alveolar nerve during invasive dental procedures, it is important to know its localization. The aim of this study was to determine the average vertical distances of the root apices of second premolars, first molars and second molars mesially and distally from the upper projection of the mandibular canal on the sagittal section of CBCT images, and determine if there were statistically significant differences between the age and gender groups. Material and methods. The research was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Banja Luka, and the sample consisted of 146 CBCT images of patients. CBCT images were obtained using Planmeca ProMax 3D Mid instrument (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) and analyzed using Planmeca Romexis Viewer software. In the sagittal section, the vertical distance from the root apex to the upper projection of the mandibular canal was measured for each examined tooth. Results. The distal root of the first molar (4.88 mm) had the greatest average vertical distance of the root apex from the mandibular canal, and the distal root of the second molar had the smallest average vertical distance (2.76 mm). There was statistically significant difference between certain age groups in the values of individual roots, for the second molar mesially and distally (p < 0.05), while for the first molar mesially the value of p was at the limit of significance (p = 0.05). Conclusion. The results of this study showed that distal root of the mandibular second molar had the smallest vertical distance from mandibular canal, therefore an extra caution during a root canal treatment and careful planning of oral surgery in this region is recommended.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…Izuzimajući treći molar, Pucilo je sa saradnicima u sistematskom pregledu zaključio da je distalni koren drugog molara najbliži mandibularnom kanalu, što se podudara sa rezultatima ove studije [21].…”

Section: Diskusijaunclassified

Cbct analysis of apical distance between second lower premolars, first and second lower molars and mandibular canal

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The articles that were included in the IAC/IANC group were excluded from this group. The most recent, consecutive 50 articles containing “mandibular canal” but neither “inferior alveolar canal” nor “inferior alveolar nerve canal” were included (defined as the MC group) (Abd Fattah, Hariri, Nambiar, Abu Bakar, & Abdul Rahman, 2019; Al‐Shayyab, Qabba'ah, Alsoleihat, & Baqain, 2019; Alves, Dias, Mansa, & Machado, 2020; Arias et al, 2019; Bosykh, Turkina, Franco, Franco, & Makeeva, 2019; Bozkurt & Görürgöz, 2019; Burian et al, 2019; Cârstocea, Săndulescu, Hostiuc, & Rusu, 2020; M. H. Chen et al, 2019; Costa et al, 2019; Esposito et al, 2019; Felice et al, 2019; Felice, Barausse, Pistilli, Ippolito, & Esposito, 2019; Fistarol, De Stavola, Fincato, & Bressan, 2019; Freire, Nascimento, Vasconcelos, Freitas, & Haiter‐Neto, 2019; Friedrich, Matschke, & Wilczak, 2019; Iwanaga et al, 2020, 2020; Iwanaga, Wong, Kikuta, & Tubbs, 2019; Kalabalik & Aytuğar, 2019; Koç, Eroğlu, & Bilgili, 2019; Komal, Bedi, Wadhwani, Aurora, & Chauhan, 2020; K. C. Lee, Yoon, Philipone, & Peters, 2019; Liye et al, 2019; Matsuda, Yoshimura, & Sano, 2019; Matzen, Petersen, Schropp, & Wenzel, 2019; Matzen, Villefrance, Nørholt, Bak, & Wenzel, 2020; Munhoz, Arita, Nishimura, & Watanabe, 2019; Na et al, 2019; Ngeow & Chai, 2020a, 2020b; Nicol, Loncle, Pasquet, & Vacher, 2019; Okumuş & Dumlu, 2019; Oliveira et al, 2019; Ozdede, 2020; Pedersen, Matzen, Hermann, & Nørholt, 2019; Predoiu, Rusu, & Chiriţă, 2019; Puciło, Lipski, Sroczyk‐Jaszczyńska, Puciło, & Nowicka, 2020; Raju et al, 2019; Sahl, Alqahtani, Alqahtani, & Gallez, 2018; Satir, 2019; Sholapurkar & Davies, 2019; Sinha et al, 2019; Sun et al, 2019; Tereshchuk & Sukharev, 2019; Uğur Ay...…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mandibular canal vs. inferior alveolar canal: Evidence‐based terminology analysis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The mandibular canal, as it was formerly named in Terminologia Anatomica (TA), has also been called the inferior alveolar (nerve) canal in many scientific publications. This study was conducted to investigate how these terms have been understood in different regions and different areas of expertise and to discuss the appropriate future application of the term “mandibular canal.” Methods A literature search was conducted using PubMed, and articles using different terms for this structure were classified into two groups, inferior alveolar canal/inferior alveolar nerve canal (IAC/IANC) and the mandibular canal (MC). The 50 most recent articles in each group were included. Publication year, journal title, country of the first author, and affiliation of all authors were recorded in both groups for all 100 articles. Results There was a significant difference between the IAC/IANC and MC groups in the numbers of anatomy journals, other journals, and anatomy affiliations. Turkey published most frequently with a total of 15 articles, followed by Iran with 10 articles, and China/India/United States with seven each. When the six countries of the first author that had three or more publications in each group were compared, only Turkey appeared in both groups; otherwise, different countries were in the two groups. Conclusions Based on the results of this analysis, and considering that the tentative new term “inferior alveolar foramen” is used in the latest TA, we suggest that the mandibular canal should be renamed the “inferior alveolar canal.”

show abstract

“…The mandibular canal (MC) is an anatomical structure located in the ramus and body of the mandible 1 , which extends from the mandibular foramen to the mental foramen, and is responsible for the passage of the vasculonervous bundle, which includes a nerve, an artery, and a vein. These structures are responsible for sensations, blood innervation of mandibular teeth, interdental papilla, and periodontal and alveolar bone tissue, respectively [2][3][4] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bifurcação e trifurcação do canal mandibular: relato de caso a partir de um achado em tomografia computadorizada de feixe de cone

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Este relato tem por objetivo descrever uma rara variação do canal mandibular (CM) apresentando trifurcação direita e bifurcação esquerda, por meio da Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico (TCFC). Relato do caso: Paciente do sexo feminino, 26 anos de idade, sem comprometimento sistêmico, foi encaminhada para remoção cirúrgica dos terceiros molares inferiores devido a presença de sintomatologia dolorosa. Foi solicitada uma TCFC para avaliar a relação entre terceiros molares e o canal mandibular, para orientar o planejamento cirúrgico. O volume tomográfico foi analisado por meio do software Sidexis (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Alemanha). Durante a análise dos cortes tomográficos, foi possível observar a presença de variações do CM bilateralmente. Observou-se bifurcação do CM direito e trifurcação do CM esquerdo. Conclusão: O presente relato destacou a importância da TCFC para o diagnóstico das alterações anatômicas, como a trifurcação do canal mandibular.

show abstract

The anatomical relationship between the roots of erupted permanent teeth and the mandibular canal: a systematic review

Cited by 11 publications

References 44 publications

Cbct analysis of apical distance between second lower premolars, first and second lower molars and mandibular canal

Cbct analysis of apical distance between second lower premolars, first and second lower molars and mandibular canal

Mandibular canal vs. inferior alveolar canal: Evidence‐based terminology analysis

Bifurcação e trifurcação do canal mandibular: relato de caso a partir de um achado em tomografia computadorizada de feixe de cone

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About