The Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritizing Features in the Selection of Web Service

Godse, Manish; Sonar, Rajendra M.; Mulik, Shrikant

doi:10.1109/ecows.2008.21

Cited by 21 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Compared to the AHP approach [13] for selecting a web service, our framework tries to get nearer to the users by considering their preferences expressed in a more understandable manner (e.g. not using just weights).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using arguments on requirements for services

Letia

Goron

2011

2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When dealing with public descriptions of interacting software services, we focus towards identifying those specification gaps from the description of the service workflows based on Open Workflow Nets. Apart from the functional requirements we are tackling the use of estimated non-functional requirements by arguments. We are using the reasoning power of the Value based Argumentation Framework, which allows us to decide upon the best course of action to consider for successfully accomplishing the pre-established functional requirements of the interacting software services, and also to solve the preferences in an efficient and time consuming manner.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using arguments on requirements for services

Letia

Goron

2011

2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many works in the literature [7][8] [9] rely on a known multiple criteria decision method called Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [10] to rank services in the order of their effectiveness in meeting conflicting QoS attributes. Unfortunately, these works have two main limitations: 1) they are restricted to the operational level and make no connection with the strategic level; 2) they do not evaluate the importance of each service for the company's business (tactical level); instead, a fixed selection criteria is defined, in the operational level, and applied indistinctly to different types of services.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computing Strategic Trade-Offs in Web Service Deployment and Selection

Neves

Oliveira

Lima

et al. 2012

2012 IEEE 19th International Conference on Web Services

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The subject of business-IT alignment has increasingly attracted the attention of executives in the past decade. The purpose is to leverage the potential of IT to improve business performance. This goal can be achieved by developing mechanisms to enhance the communication between business and IT. In the same track, its essential to apply methods to assure that IT investments are driven by the strategic goals and priorities of the company. Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) is widely recognized as a technology that promotes IT alignment and business agility. However, strategic goals of firms have been frequently neglected when dealing with technical subjects such as web service selection and deployment. In this work, we propose a multiple criteria decision method based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) that is able to accommodate in a single framework both the technical and the strategic requirements of web service deployment and selection. Our framework help IT managers to find the configuration that best translates the preferences of the customer and the priorities of the company. A numeric case study compares our approach to other traditional uses of AHP.Index Terms-web service selection, web service deployment, IT alignment, quality of service, analytic hierarchy process, business strategy

show abstract

“…32 is the closest to the one presented in this paper since it is also based on AHP but it does not take into account the correlation that might exist among the attributes or the trade-offs that the decision maker might wish to make. In most of the existing approaches these trade-offs are usually limited to a certain strategy for assigning scores to services, usually weighted, and weighing the relative importance of the attribute.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combining boolean consistent fuzzy logic and ahp illustrated on the web service selection problem

Dragović¹,

Turajlić²,

Radojević³

et al. 2014

IJCIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) idealistically assumes the independence of the criteria which are often interrelated, conflicting or can be traded-off. It is, therefore, proposed that AHP could be extended by applying fuzzy logic to adequately incorporate the different relationships that may exist among the criteria. It is shown that the conventional and consistent fuzzy approaches could actually lead to different choices and an explanation is provided. Finally, two different application scenarios are illustrated on the web service selection problem.

show abstract

The Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritizing Features in the Selection of Web Service

Cited by 21 publications

References 16 publications

Using arguments on requirements for services

Using arguments on requirements for services

Computing Strategic Trade-Offs in Web Service Deployment and Selection

Combining boolean consistent fuzzy logic and ahp illustrated on the web service selection problem

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About