2016
DOI: 10.14687/jhs.v13i2.3593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analysis of the relationship between epistemological beliefs and TPACK education competence among pre-service teachers

Abstract: The purpose of the present research is defining TPACK education competence and epistemological beliefs of pre-service teachers, and presenting the relationship between TPACK education competence and epistemological belief. In accordance with this purpose, TPACK education competence scale and Epistemological Beliefs Questionnaire were conducted on 342 (222 female-65%, 120 male-35%) pre-service teachers studying senior year at Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Education in 2012-2013 academic-year. Accordi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The facilitator style was the preferred teaching style used among the teachers in the classroom during the observation. This finding is in line with research findings by Safaei and Shahrokhi (2019), Efilti andÇoklar (2013), andFatemi andRaoufi (2014). However, it is in contrast to research findings by Kazemi and Soleimani (2013), Faruji (2012), Amini, Samani, and Lotfi (2012), Elkaseh, Wong, andFung (2014), Shaari, Yusoff, Ghazali, Osman, andDzahir (2014), and Sheikh and Mahmood (2014) who found the EFL teachers' preference teaching style is Formal Authority Style.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The facilitator style was the preferred teaching style used among the teachers in the classroom during the observation. This finding is in line with research findings by Safaei and Shahrokhi (2019), Efilti andÇoklar (2013), andFatemi andRaoufi (2014). However, it is in contrast to research findings by Kazemi and Soleimani (2013), Faruji (2012), Amini, Samani, and Lotfi (2012), Elkaseh, Wong, andFung (2014), Shaari, Yusoff, Ghazali, Osman, andDzahir (2014), and Sheikh and Mahmood (2014) who found the EFL teachers' preference teaching style is Formal Authority Style.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Diğer taraftan, sosyo-ekonomik seviyesi düşük öğretmen adaylarının geleneksel bilgiye daha fazla önem verdikleri sonucuna varılabilir. Benzer bulgulara alan yazında farklı çalışmalar da rastlanmaktadır (Acun ve diğerleri 2018; Alkın-Şahin, Tunca ve Ulubey, 2013;Çelen ve Seferoğlu, 2016;Efilti ve Çoklar, 2016;Üztemur ve Dinç, 2018). Bununla birlikte internete akıllı telefon ile erişenler ile dizüstü bilgisayar ile erişenler arasında, dizüstü bilgisayarlar erişenler lehine, otorite ile ve kişisel deneyimler ile gerekçelendirme arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık olduğunu göstermektedir.…”
Section: öğRetmen Adaylarının Epistemolojik Inançlar Ile Değişkenlerin Ilişkisinin Incelenmesiunclassified
“…In the literature, the epistemological beliefs of teacher candidates have been studied by associating them with various variables. These variables include the following: learning and learning styles [16]; adopted education philosophy [17]; level of reading motivation [18]; principles of pedagogy [19]; competency of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) education [20]; dispositions, and views on teaching as persuasion [21]; concept teaching [22]; predictors of internet based learning activities [23]; (Bra˚ten and Strømsø, 2006); problem-solving and levels of powerfulness [24]; problem-solving strategies [25]; (Öngen, 2003); environmental knowledge and environmental attitudes [26]; academic achievement [27]; (Arslantaş, 2015); learning [28]; learning approaches and study orchestrations [29,30]; epistemological worldviews and self-efficacy beliefs [31]; socio-cultural factors [32]; informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues [33]; argumentativeness and achievement levels [34] learning approaches [35] resolving conceptual and empirical issues [36]; exploring bilingual [37]; learning tactics and success [38]; attitudes towards chemistry course [39]; the nature of knowing [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%