1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00222948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analysis of the NSW wheat variety database. II. Variance component estimation

Abstract: The efficiency of various trialling systems for wheat variety evaluation in New South Wales (NSW) is considered. This involved the estimation of the variance components due to genotype, genotype-by-year, genotype-by-location and genotype-by-year-by-location. It is shown that there is a significant reduction in the magnitude of these variance components by the inclusion of the interaction of genotype maturity, winter habit and aluminium tolerance with environment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with other studies that have used the CPD to evaluate METs network efficiency (Cullis et al, 1996;Ceretta & van Eeuwijk, 2008;Arief et al, 2015). The factor that showed the strongest impact on the CPD indicator in our study was the number of locations, followed by the number of replications in each experiment (Fig.…”
Section: Met Network Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result is consistent with other studies that have used the CPD to evaluate METs network efficiency (Cullis et al, 1996;Ceretta & van Eeuwijk, 2008;Arief et al, 2015). The factor that showed the strongest impact on the CPD indicator in our study was the number of locations, followed by the number of replications in each experiment (Fig.…”
Section: Met Network Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Hereafter, a two-stage, mixed model approach was utilized [23] using ASReml [24]. Each experiment was analyzed separately with the best spatial models being determined after first fitting the experimental design and then modelling the residual variation with autoregressive row and column terms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial model Gleeson 1998, Cullis et al 1998) was fitted in the first stage for each trait at each site. The BLUE (Best linear unbiased estimators) and weights (Cullis et al 1996) were calculated and used in the second stage analysis. Protein level is confounded with yield level due to the negative phenotypic correlation between yield and protein level (believed to be largely a dilution effect).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%