2015
DOI: 10.1515/geocart-2015-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analysis of spatial and temporal changes of land cover and land use in the reclaimed areas with the application of airborne orthophotomaps and LANDSAT images

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the possible use of geoinformatics tools and generally available geodata for mapping land cover/use on the reclaimed areas. The choice of subject was dictated by the growing number of such areas and the related problem of their restoration. Modern technology, including GIS, photogrammetry and remote sensing are relevant in assessing the reclamation effects and monitoring of changes taking place on such sites. The LULC classes mapping, supported with thorough knowledge o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Referring to the papers on the use of Landsat images for monitoring of LULC changes and monitoring of agricultural land abandonment (Baker, Lawrence, Montagne, & Patten, 2006;Hall, Botkin, Strebel, Woods, & Goets, 1991;Prishchepov, Volker, Dubinin, & Alcantara, 2012;Reschkea & Hüttich, 2014;Szostak et al, 2015;Townsend et al, 2009), images Sentinel-2 (Bontemps et al, 2015) provide new possibilities of application, mainly due to better terrain resolution of spectral channels R, G, B and NIR. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Referring to the papers on the use of Landsat images for monitoring of LULC changes and monitoring of agricultural land abandonment (Baker, Lawrence, Montagne, & Patten, 2006;Hall, Botkin, Strebel, Woods, & Goets, 1991;Prishchepov, Volker, Dubinin, & Alcantara, 2012;Reschkea & Hüttich, 2014;Szostak et al, 2015;Townsend et al, 2009), images Sentinel-2 (Bontemps et al, 2015) provide new possibilities of application, mainly due to better terrain resolution of spectral channels R, G, B and NIR. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the most popular classification methodsupervised classification -was used. The ObjectBased Image Analysis (OBIA) was the subject of the previous studies (Szostak, Wężyk, Hawryło, & Pietrzykowski, 2015;Szostak, Wężyk, Hawryło, & Puchała, 2016;Szostak et al, 2014). OBIA provides better results, but requires specialized software and user's knowledge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the LULC classes of broad-leaved forest, coniferous forest, and transitional woodland shrub, we can observe a dynamic change in growth. In previous studies [11][12][13], these areas showed an increase of spatial range in forested areas from the year 2000 to 2016, using image classification of Landsat 7 (2000), on-screen vectorization orthophoto (2009), Landsat 8 (2013), and the image classification of Sentinel-2 (2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the Machów area, there are also important agricultural lands, as follows: arable lands and pastures, which covered a total of 38.7% of the analysed area according to the agroforestry type of reclamation for this area. According to the previous studies, based on Landsat 7 and Lansat 8 image processing [11][12][13], the increase in forested area for the period of time of 2000-2016 for Jeziórko was 13.3%, and for Machów was 14.6%. The forested areas in 2000 (Landsat 7) had a total value of 82.0% for Jeziórko, and 46.1% for Machów research area, and in 2013 (Landsat 8), Jeziórko was 93.8% and Machów was 50.5% [11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the results were converted from a raster to a vector layer in order to compare it to the results of a photointerpretation and on-screen vectorization orthophoto. The Sentinel-2 (ESA) classification results were also compared with previous studies [36]-the classification of Landsat 7 (NASA; 2000) and Landsat 8 (NASA; 2013) images. The participation of individual LULC classes in the research areas was calculated with a polygon tool to calculate each area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%