Abstract. Detachments of large parts of low-angle mountain glaciers in
recent years have raised great attention due to their threats to lives and
properties downstream. While current studies have mainly focused on
post-event analysis, a few opportunities have presented themselves to assess
the potential hazards of a glacier prone to detachment. Here we present a
comprehensive analysis of the dynamics and runout hazard of a low-angle
(∼20∘) valley glacier, close to the Qinghai–Tibet
railway and highway, in the East Kunlun Mountains on the Qinghai–Tibet
Plateau. The changes in morphology, terminus position, and surface elevation
of the glacier between 1975 and 2021 were characterized with a stereo-image
pair from the historical KH-9 spy satellite, six digital elevation models
(DEMs), and 11 high-resolution images from Planet Labs. The surface flow
velocities of the glacier tongue between 2009 and 2020 were also tracked
based on cross-correlation of Planet images. Our observations show that the
glacier snout has been progressively advancing in the past 4 decades,
with a stepwise increase in advance velocity from 4.55±0.46ma-1 between 1975 and 2009 to 30.88±2.36ma-1 between 2015 and 2020. DEM differencing confirms the
glacial advance, with surface thinning in the source region and thickening
in the tongue. The net volume loss over the glacier tongue was about
11.21±2.66×105 m3 during 1975–2018. Image
cross-correlation reveals that the surface flow velocity of the glacier
tongue has been increasing in recent years, with the mean velocity below
4800 m more than tripling from 6.3±1.8ma-1 during
2009–2010 to 22.3±3.2ma-1 during 2019–2020. With
a combined analysis of the geomorphic, climatic, and hydrologic conditions
of the glacier, we suggest that the flow of the glacier tongue is mainly
controlled by the glacier geometry, while the presence of an ice-dammed lake
and a supraglacial pond implies a hydrological influence as well. Taking the
whole glacier and glacier tongue as two endmember avalanche sources, we
assessed the potential runout distances of these two scenarios using the
angle of reach and the Voellmy–Salm avalanche model. The assessments show
that the avalanche of the whole glacier would easily travel a distance that would threaten the safety of the railway. In contrast, the detachment of the
glacier tongue would threaten the railway only with a small angle of reach
or when employing a low-friction parameter in the Voellmy–Salm modeling.