2021
DOI: 10.29051/el.v7iesp.3.15725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analysis of semantic fields “diplomacy”, “foreign policy” in the english and russian languages

Abstract: The concepts of diplomacy and foreign policy are directly connected. Continuing events on the world stage and the interaction of political figures (heads of state and diplomatic workers) lead to the formation of a common international situation. The current general international situation has a significant effect on the foreign policy of countries. Diplomacy is a key tool for the successful conduct of the foreign policy of each active participating state. Foreign policy significantly affects the independent sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E.I. Beliaieva sees modality as «the relation of the utterance content determined by a speaker to the reality in term of its truth / falsity and represents her classification of epistemic modality, in terms of which four types are emphasized: modality of probability (assumption), modality of logical necessity (reasoning), modality of uncertainty (doubt), and modality of certainty» (Belyaeva, 1985). There is similar classification of epistemic modality (Bondarenko, V.N.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E.I. Beliaieva sees modality as «the relation of the utterance content determined by a speaker to the reality in term of its truth / falsity and represents her classification of epistemic modality, in terms of which four types are emphasized: modality of probability (assumption), modality of logical necessity (reasoning), modality of uncertainty (doubt), and modality of certainty» (Belyaeva, 1985). There is similar classification of epistemic modality (Bondarenko, V.N.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%