1985
DOI: 10.1016/0196-6774(85)90003-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analysis of a fringe heuristic for binary search trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trees produced are called median-of-(2k + 1) trees. They can equivalently be viewed as trees produced by a balancing heuristic applied to the fringe of the tree [24], [29]. It is clear that the external nodes are no longer uniformly picked, and as a consequence Proposition 3 does not apply.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trees produced are called median-of-(2k + 1) trees. They can equivalently be viewed as trees produced by a balancing heuristic applied to the fringe of the tree [24], [29]. It is clear that the external nodes are no longer uniformly picked, and as a consequence Proposition 3 does not apply.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method presented above is simple and didactical. Another method uses the properties of Polya-Eggenberger urn models, which have been suggested for the analysis of search trees by Poblete and Munro [26]. Bagchi and Pal [4] developed a limit law for general urn models and applied it in the analysis of random 2-3 trees.…”
Section: Urn Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter algorithm can be improved by means of a simple heuristic proposed and analyzed by Poblete and Munro [9]. It turns out that the algorithm for 2-3 trees is efficient whereas that of the binary tree is inefficient.…”
Section: Fringe Analysis Of Search Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, using Eqs. As a final example, Yao's second-order analysis of 2-3 trees (i.e., the consideration of the two bottom tiers of nodes) from our viewpoint is simply the fringe problem for which (c,,C2,c 3) C4,C5,c 6) c 7 ) = (4,5,6,6,7,8,9) and Q is the (irreducible) matrix the a.s. result analogous to Theorem 2.12 of Yao [10]. 12 n 2n(n) 18 (10) Our result, Theorem 2, also applies in more complicated settings such as the generalized k -t binary search trees of Cunto and Gasc6n [3], a generalization of P.M. trees where there are up to / keys per node and rotations are made each time there is a linear array of 2k -1 nodes in the fringe.…”
Section: Fringe Analysis Of Search Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%