1972
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1972.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analysis and interpretation of differences between reciprocal crosses of Nicotian rustica varieties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, they allowed all the components involved to be quantified within a single model, its adequacy to be tested statistically and the significance of the parameters to be assessed. Thus the methods outlined by Jinks, Perkins and Gregory (1972) for the analysis of reciprocal differences have allowed the response to be described although it is clearly complex in showing an array of underlying determinants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, they allowed all the components involved to be quantified within a single model, its adequacy to be tested statistically and the significance of the parameters to be assessed. Thus the methods outlined by Jinks, Perkins and Gregory (1972) for the analysis of reciprocal differences have allowed the response to be described although it is clearly complex in showing an array of underlying determinants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of the weighted squared deviations of the observed statistics from their expectations when the model is fitted is a chi-square for (k-p) d.f., and can be used to test the goodness of fit of the model. By deleting redundant parameters, or fitting additional parameters when necessary it is possible to arrive at the simplest model which will account for the observed variation (Jinks, Perkins and Gregory, 1972).…”
Section: The Genetical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reciprocal differences that are expressed later in development, as has occurred in Solanum (present manuscript), perennial ryegrass (Hayward and Breeze 1968), maize (Garwood et al 1970), and tobacco Jinks et al 1972) could be interpreted as long-term maternal effects. Conversely, these reciprocal differences could result from paternal effects resulting from differential pollentube growth as has been described in corn (Mulcahy 1971;Ottaviano et al 1980), Dianthus (Mulcahy and Mulcahy 1975), radish (Marshall and Ellstrand 1986) and zucchini squash Winsor et al 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%