1984
DOI: 10.1109/joe.1984.1145604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analysis and digital signal processing of NOAA's surface current mapping system

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum in HK kk for u , corresponding to the maximum expected observation error, is adjacent to the coast where the angle of intersection of the radial beams from the CODAR transmitters are almost parallel. This is consistent with the expected limitations of the CODAR system in resolving both components of velocity [ Lipa and Barrick , 1983; Leise , 1984].…”
Section: Assimilation Of Hf Radar Datasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The minimum in HK kk for u , corresponding to the maximum expected observation error, is adjacent to the coast where the angle of intersection of the radial beams from the CODAR transmitters are almost parallel. This is consistent with the expected limitations of the CODAR system in resolving both components of velocity [ Lipa and Barrick , 1983; Leise , 1984].…”
Section: Assimilation Of Hf Radar Datasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The asymmetry is thus a feature of individual Doppler spectra, rather than a result of modulation induced power variations from one spectrum to the next and must be accounted for when velocities are estimated from the Doppler spectra. The usual practice at HF has been to estimate Doppler spectrum peak positions from the centroid of a restricted portion of the Doppler spectrum [Leise, 1984].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power spectra were computed for each time series, and each frequency estimate (near the main Bragg peaks) provided a single radial surface current estimate. The angular position within the appropriate annulus was estimated from the phase difference measured across the receive antenna using the Liese (1984) algorithm. This is the weakest part of the radar system.…”
Section: Field Programmentioning
confidence: 99%