1980
DOI: 10.5459/bnzsee.13.2.108-143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analysis and design of and the evaluation of design actions for reinforced concrete ductile shear wall structures

Abstract: A comprehensive review of the state of the art in the design of earthquake resisting ductile structural walls is presented. The material has been compiled from the technical literature, the deliberations within the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering and research efforts at the University of Canterbury. The paper attempts a classification of structural types and elaborates on the hierarchy in energy dissipation. After a review of available analysis procedures, including modelling assumption… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fintel [19] and Naaseh [20] recognized the better seismic performances of wall systems as compared with those of frame systems. Paulay and Williams [21] described the evaluation of the design actions and the analysis and the design of R/C ductile shear walls; Paulay [22] approached the problem of the design of ductile R/C structural walls for earthquake resistance; Wood [15] underlined the good behaviour of Chilean wall buildings during the 3 March 1985 earthquake. Coull and Stafford Smith [13] studied the analysis and the design of tall building structures devoting great part of their work to the seismic behaviour of the shear walls; Paulay and Priestley [9], in their book of 1992, collected all their previous studies regarding the seismic design of R/C buildings with particular reference to shear walls and coupled shear walls; Sezen et al [23] highlighted the good behaviour of Turkish wall buildings during the 17 August 1999 earthquake.…”
Section: Squat Vs Slender Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fintel [19] and Naaseh [20] recognized the better seismic performances of wall systems as compared with those of frame systems. Paulay and Williams [21] described the evaluation of the design actions and the analysis and the design of R/C ductile shear walls; Paulay [22] approached the problem of the design of ductile R/C structural walls for earthquake resistance; Wood [15] underlined the good behaviour of Chilean wall buildings during the 3 March 1985 earthquake. Coull and Stafford Smith [13] studied the analysis and the design of tall building structures devoting great part of their work to the seismic behaviour of the shear walls; Paulay and Priestley [9], in their book of 1992, collected all their previous studies regarding the seismic design of R/C buildings with particular reference to shear walls and coupled shear walls; Sezen et al [23] highlighted the good behaviour of Turkish wall buildings during the 17 August 1999 earthquake.…”
Section: Squat Vs Slender Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%