2012
DOI: 10.5670/oceanog.2012.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Amundsen Sea and the Antarctic Ice Sheet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
155
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
155
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S1) and yields a different spatial pattern with higher peak melt (187 m yr −1 ). Irrespective of correction for this dynamic component, these estimates are 1-5-year snapshots of melt at single points, and the interannual variability in melt rates in the region (e.g., Dutrieux et al, 2014;Jacobs et al, 2012) prevents extrapolation through time. Average melt rates beneath the shelves cannot be easily obtained from these point measurements, but the polygon-based methods we use, though limited in spatial resolution, yield average rates beneath large portions of the shelves.…”
Section: Comparison To Previous Melt Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1) and yields a different spatial pattern with higher peak melt (187 m yr −1 ). Irrespective of correction for this dynamic component, these estimates are 1-5-year snapshots of melt at single points, and the interannual variability in melt rates in the region (e.g., Dutrieux et al, 2014;Jacobs et al, 2012) prevents extrapolation through time. Average melt rates beneath the shelves cannot be easily obtained from these point measurements, but the polygon-based methods we use, though limited in spatial resolution, yield average rates beneath large portions of the shelves.…”
Section: Comparison To Previous Melt Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller ice shelves in the Amundsen Sea are melted by warmer waters. Sea ice growth is less intense in the Amundsen Sea (Petty et al 2013), allowing warm and saline Circumpolar Deep Water at approximately 18C to flood the continental shelf and occupy its ice shelf cavities (Jacobs et al 2012). These ice shelves melt at mean rates of O(10) m yr 21 and hence are much smaller than FRIS, responding to ocean changes on a time scale of only a few months (Heimbach and Losch 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for their decline appears to be flow of warm dense water onto the shelf, channeled by bathymetric troughs leading to the deep inner basins. This has been observed on the Marguerite Trough [5][6][7] and on the Amundsen Shelf [8][9][10]. Model studies [11,12] indicate that the on-shelf flow of warm dense water is forced by along-shelf (i.e., eastward in the Amundsen Sea) winds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%