2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Amsterdam Studies of Acute Psychiatry - II (ASAP-II): a comparative study of psychiatric intensive care units in the Netherlands

Abstract: Background: The number of patients in whom mental illness progresses to stages in which acute, and often forced treatment is warranted, is on the increase across Europe. As a consequence, more patients are involuntarily admitted to Psychiatric Intensive Care Units (PICU). From several studies and reports it has become evident that important dissimilarities exist between PICU's. The current study seeks to describe organisational as well as clinical and patient related factors across ten PICU's in and outside th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, after a first wave (between 2005 and 2009) of locally implementing the model of psychiatric intensive care to locked wards, a second wave (from 2010, in alignment with the bed reduction policy) is coming up allowing for good benchmarking and outcomes research on therapeutic interventions in PICUs in Belgium. A similar evolution was seen in the Netherlands with the planning of the ASAP-II study (Koppelmans et al 2009). This study aims at comparing different Dutch PICUs on, amongst others, treatment aspects, outcome variables and rates of coercive actions.…”
Section: The Imminent Change In Mental Health Care Organization and Tsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In this way, after a first wave (between 2005 and 2009) of locally implementing the model of psychiatric intensive care to locked wards, a second wave (from 2010, in alignment with the bed reduction policy) is coming up allowing for good benchmarking and outcomes research on therapeutic interventions in PICUs in Belgium. A similar evolution was seen in the Netherlands with the planning of the ASAP-II study (Koppelmans et al 2009). This study aims at comparing different Dutch PICUs on, amongst others, treatment aspects, outcome variables and rates of coercive actions.…”
Section: The Imminent Change In Mental Health Care Organization and Tsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…An additional Bonferroni post-hoc analysis was used to assess the differences between the patient groups who enrolled at different times. Differences between the patient groups in nominal and ordinal variables were examined using cross-tabulations and were tested for statistical significance with a χ 2 test [ 50 ]. All analyses were performed with the statistical software package SPSS version 15.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The admission policy describes only accepting patients who are legally detained under the Mental Health Act 2001 and only after they 'cannot be safely assessed or treated in an open acute inpatient facility'. This shows dissimilarities exist between PICU's in different countries in terms of legal status, patient selection criteria, type of care and treatment outcome (Crowhurst & Bowers, 2002;Karen Barlow et al 2000;Bowers et al 2008;Koppelmans & Schoevers, 2009;Bailey, 2014;Winkler et al 2019). It is unclear whether these differences in service operation and admission criteria of PICU's are built on community needs, or a result of historical or financial developments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%