2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01935.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Amphetamine Response Moderates the Relationship Between Negative Emotionality and Alcohol Use

Abstract: Background Considerable evidence suggests that sensitivity to the stimulant effects of alcohol and other drugs is a risk marker for heavy or problematic use of those substances. A separate body of research implicates negative emotionality. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the independent and interactive effects of the stimulant response, assessed with an amphetamine challenge, and negative emotionality on alcohol and drug use. Methods Healthy young women and men completed the Multidimensional Pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous research that suggests that a high level of negative emotionality may promote reward seeking. For example, among people inclined to pursue a certain kind of reward (i.e., those sensitive to drug reinforcement), negative emotionality is associated with high-risk, high-reward behavior (i.e., binge drinking; Allen & Gabbay, 2013). This study extends that work by showing that self-injury -another risky yet reinforcing activity -is associated with deficient inhibition over negative emotional impulses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This is consistent with previous research that suggests that a high level of negative emotionality may promote reward seeking. For example, among people inclined to pursue a certain kind of reward (i.e., those sensitive to drug reinforcement), negative emotionality is associated with high-risk, high-reward behavior (i.e., binge drinking; Allen & Gabbay, 2013). This study extends that work by showing that self-injury -another risky yet reinforcing activity -is associated with deficient inhibition over negative emotional impulses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For example, there is a recent funding opportunity announcement (PA‐13‐339) from the NIH “…to promote research to study the neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms that might explain how alcohol and stimulants interact at genetic, epigenetic, cellular, neurocircuitry and behavioral levels to promote co‐addiction.” One aspect of stimulant and alcohol co‐ingestion that has been described in the literature is the possibility of bidirectional vulnerability to the stimulant effects of each substance. For example, Allen and Gabbay () discussed the idea that individuals who are very responsive to the stimulant effects of amphetamines may be more responsive to the stimulant effects of alcohol. In this original research report, various potential mechanisms (e.g., personality traits and reward sensitivity) are discussed, as well as a call for further research (Allen and Gabbay, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Allen and Gabbay () discussed the idea that individuals who are very responsive to the stimulant effects of amphetamines may be more responsive to the stimulant effects of alcohol. In this original research report, various potential mechanisms (e.g., personality traits and reward sensitivity) are discussed, as well as a call for further research (Allen and Gabbay, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Concurrent use of stimulants (either amphetamines or caffeine) and alcohol can increase wakefulness and mask the depressant effects of alcohol on the central nervous system, until much larger amounts of alcohol have been consumed. 30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%