2019
DOI: 10.3390/jof5010010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘Amoeboid Predator-Fungal Animal Virulence’ Hypothesis

Abstract: The observation that some aspects of amoeba-fungal interactions resemble animal phagocytic cell-fungal interactions, together with the finding that amoeba passage can enhance the virulence of some pathogenic fungi, has stimulated interest in the amoeba as a model system for the study of fungal virulence. Amoeba provide a relatively easy and cheap model system where multiple variables can be controlled for the study of fungi-protozoal (amoeba) interactions. Consequently, there have been significant efforts to s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest similarities between fungal molecules that are recognized by phagocytosis receptors in amoebae and mammals. Overall, our results fit into the recently formulated amoeboid predator-fungal animal virulence hypothesis whereby there is a nexus of causation from selective pressure of amoeboid environmental predators and the evolution of fungal virulence against mammals [13]. We have shown that Paracoccidioides spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest similarities between fungal molecules that are recognized by phagocytosis receptors in amoebae and mammals. Overall, our results fit into the recently formulated amoeboid predator-fungal animal virulence hypothesis whereby there is a nexus of causation from selective pressure of amoeboid environmental predators and the evolution of fungal virulence against mammals [13]. We have shown that Paracoccidioides spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our results support the hypothesis that interaction with sympatric soil predators selects for traits that allow survival of Paracoccidioides spp. in mammalian hosts and add to the existing evidence for the amoeboid predator-animal virulence hypothesis [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most opportunistic pathogens are not transmitted person to person but rather transit through the environment between hosts and therefore, it is likely that the environment plays a significant role in evolution of protective traits. Predation by protists is one of the major mortality factors for bacteria in the environment and it is likely that traits that protect against predation may also impact human hosts during infection (13). P. aeruginosa is responsible for a variety of nosocomial acute as well as chronic infections (15) in particular chronic lung infections in CF patients (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…harm caused by a pathogen towards its host, is a long-standing subject of investigation with important implications for human health. Most opportunistic pathogens are not transmitted person to person but rather transit through the environment between hosts and therefore, it is unlikely that virulence traits evolve in the host (13). Rather, it is more likely that these traits evolve in the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to most Candida species which have a long‐term history as human commensals, fungi such as A. fumigatus or Cr. neoformans reside in natural reservoirs suggesting that predatory selection pressure by amoebae and other protists could have driven the emergence of phagocytic escape mechanisms and thereby promote survival in mammalian hosts (Erken et al, ; Casadevall et al, ). Experimental studies have corroborated this idea using well‐known model organisms such as Dictyostelium discoideum or Acanthamoeba castellanii , showing that fungi can exploit their virulence determinants to escape phagocytic uptake or killing (Steenbergen et al, ; Steenbergen et al, ; Van Waeyenberghe et al, ; Hillmann et al, ; Koller et al, ; Novohradska et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%