1996
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Amino-terminal Immunoglobulin-like Domain of Activated Leukocyte Cell Adhesion Molecule Binds Specifically to the Membrane-proximal Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-rich Domain of CD6 with a 1:1 Stoichiometry

Abstract: Activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM)was recently identified as a ligand for CD6, a signaling receptor expressed on T cells, a subset of B cells, and some cells in the brain. Receptor-ligand binding assays, antibody blocking experiments, and examination of the tissue distribution of these two cell surface proteins suggest that CD6-ALCAM interactions play an important role in mediating the binding of thymocytes to thymic epithelial cells and of T cells to activated leukocytes. Presently, the detail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
76
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
76
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, mCD6, but not rsCD6 or nsCD6, was reactive with a polyclonal antiserum raised against the intracytoplasmic region of human CD6 (12) (data not shown). In cell binding experiments, both biotin-labeled rsCD6 and nsCD6 bound to Raji B cells but not to K562 erythroleukemic cells, in accordance with the differential expression of the CD6 ligand (ALCAM/CD166) (17,19) (Fig. 2D).…”
Section: Results Rscd6mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Interestingly, mCD6, but not rsCD6 or nsCD6, was reactive with a polyclonal antiserum raised against the intracytoplasmic region of human CD6 (12) (data not shown). In cell binding experiments, both biotin-labeled rsCD6 and nsCD6 bound to Raji B cells but not to K562 erythroleukemic cells, in accordance with the differential expression of the CD6 ligand (ALCAM/CD166) (17,19) (Fig. 2D).…”
Section: Results Rscd6mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…When Abs directed against either the 3A11 Ag or CD166 were used, there was a trend suggesting that adhesion was inhibited, but these results did not reach statistical significance. In our prior assays, we did not detect CD166-dependent binding (16), and this is explained by data suggesting that none of the anti-CD166 Abs available to us recognized the CD6-binding site contained in what is known as CD166 domain 1 (D1) (25,26). The observation that we detected CD6L dependence in our adhesion assays when we used soluble CD6 fusion protein, but that it was difficult to detect when we used Ab against individual CD6L led to our conclusion that neither the 3A11 Ab nor anti-CD166 mAb bind precisely the same epitope of the respective CD6L, as cellular CD6 does (25,37,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there was a trend toward inhibition of adhesion by mAbs directed against either 3A11 Ag or CD166, this did not reach statistical significance. Most anti-CD166 mAbs described, including the one we used, bind to domain 2 of CD166, whereas the CD6-binding site is contained in domain 1 of CD166 (25,26).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A function has been proposed for only 1 of these genes. CD6, containing 3 scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domains, has been shown to be the ligand for the leukocyte adhesion molecule CD166, 21 indicating the involvement of the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain in cell-cell interaction. For SRA types I and II, no differences have been shown in ligand interaction between both isoforms.lacking type I SRA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%