1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)83643-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The amino acid sequence and stability predictions of the hinge region in myosin subfragment 2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No difference was observed between papain and chymotryptic rod in these experiments. This was expected since the digestion sites for papain and chymotrypsin are only two residues apart in the primary sequence (Lu & Wong, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No difference was observed between papain and chymotryptic rod in these experiments. This was expected since the digestion sites for papain and chymotrypsin are only two residues apart in the primary sequence (Lu & Wong, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The cleavage rate of activated systems was found to be ~100-fold greater than in rigor or relaxed psoas fibers, and these data have been taken to indicate helix melting during the active cross-bridge cycle. Other indications of a lower stability of the "hinge" region have come from analysis of the amino acid sequence of rabbit myosin rod (Lu & Wong, 1985) and rat myosin rod (Strehler et al, 1986). These authors find that a region of amino acids between short S-2 and LMM has significantly lower helix-forming probability than the flanking regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the short, nonhelical, NH2-terminal segment, paramyosin is largely a coiled coil, and by sequence identity, aligns with the COOH-terminal three fourths of the myosin rod, as shown here; the corresponding portion of the MHC rod is in effect the light meromyosin sequences that form the backbone of the thick filament (for review of myosin structure see Squire, 1981). Based on the "hinge" definition of Lu and Wong (1985), the NH2-terminal portion of the MHC rod that is not contained in the shorter paramyosin molecule, the "prehinge region," is part of heavy meromyosin subfragment 2 ($2). (b) Schematic diagram of a longitudinal section of the central region of the bipolar thick filament.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myosin rods may also play an important role in the regulation of mechanochemical energy transduction. Investigations along these lines have been intensively carried out, especially focusing on the S2 region (Sutoh et al, 1978;Ueno & Harrington, 1984, 1986a; Lu & Wong, 1985;Lovell et al, 1988;Harrington et al, 1990;Sugi et al, 1992). Even given such extensive studies, the exact role of the S2 or hinge region in the rod which is essential to myosin functions and how these regions are regulated Eire not satisfactorily understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%