2006
DOI: 10.1007/11965152_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The AMI Meeting Transcription System: Progress and Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the NIST RT05 evaluation data as the development data. Delay and sum beamforming is performed with Speech/non-speech segmentation is obtained using a forced alignment of the reference transcripts on close talking microphone data using the AMI RT06s first pass ASR models [10]. Results are scored against manual references force aligned by an ASR system.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the NIST RT05 evaluation data as the development data. Delay and sum beamforming is performed with Speech/non-speech segmentation is obtained using a forced alignment of the reference transcripts on close talking microphone data using the AMI RT06s first pass ASR models [10]. Results are scored against manual references force aligned by an ASR system.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech/non-speech segmentation is obtained using a forced alignment of the reference transcripts on close talking microphone data using the AMI RT06s first pass ASR models [8]. Results are scored against manual references force aligned by an ASR system.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech/non-speech segmentation is obtained using a forced alignment of the reference transcripts on close talking microphone data using the AMI RT06s first pass ASR models [8]. Results are scored against manual references forced aligned by an ASR system.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%