1973
DOI: 10.4159/harvard.9780674423626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The American University

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
152
0
23

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 530 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
152
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…College impact research on students' academic sub-environments suggest that distinctive academic sub-environments (e.g., majors, departments, or academic disciplines) within institutions play a more critical role than institution-level environments in contributing to student outcomes (Feldman and Newcomb 1969;Feldman et al 2008;Jessor 1981;Laird et al 2008;Pascarella and Terenzini 2005;Umbach and Wawrzynski 2005). Informed by previous higher education literature (e.g., Braxton and Hargens 1996;Feldman and Newcomb 1969;Parsons and Platt 1973;Vreeland and Bidwell 1966) and their own empirical studies using Holland's (1966Holland's ( , 1973Holland's ( , 1985Holland's ( , 1997) theory of careers, Smart et al (2000) argue that understanding different academic disciplines and their environments is essential to explaining college students' experiences and their development in college. There have been other numerous studies relying on Holland's theory to examine disciplinary-based patterns of college students' experiences and outcomes such as academic and job satisfaction, academic and social involvement, and involvement in diversity-related activities (e.g., Feldman et al 2001;Feldman et al 2004;Milem and Umbach 2003;Umbach 2006;Umbach and Milem 2004;Wolniak and Pascarella 2005) and the findings of the studies generally support Smart et al's (2000) argument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…College impact research on students' academic sub-environments suggest that distinctive academic sub-environments (e.g., majors, departments, or academic disciplines) within institutions play a more critical role than institution-level environments in contributing to student outcomes (Feldman and Newcomb 1969;Feldman et al 2008;Jessor 1981;Laird et al 2008;Pascarella and Terenzini 2005;Umbach and Wawrzynski 2005). Informed by previous higher education literature (e.g., Braxton and Hargens 1996;Feldman and Newcomb 1969;Parsons and Platt 1973;Vreeland and Bidwell 1966) and their own empirical studies using Holland's (1966Holland's ( , 1973Holland's ( , 1985Holland's ( , 1997) theory of careers, Smart et al (2000) argue that understanding different academic disciplines and their environments is essential to explaining college students' experiences and their development in college. There have been other numerous studies relying on Holland's theory to examine disciplinary-based patterns of college students' experiences and outcomes such as academic and job satisfaction, academic and social involvement, and involvement in diversity-related activities (e.g., Feldman et al 2001;Feldman et al 2004;Milem and Umbach 2003;Umbach 2006;Umbach and Milem 2004;Wolniak and Pascarella 2005) and the findings of the studies generally support Smart et al's (2000) argument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Такой [Parsons, Platt 1973]. Авторы выделяют пять основных задач, решения которых ожидает общество от этого учреждения:…”
Section: эволюция моделей университетского управленияunclassified
“…Η συμμετοχή ωστόσο στην παραγωγή της γνώσης και την αυτοδιοίκηση πρέπει να λαμβάνει υπόψη τις προτεραιότητες του διδακτικού-ερευνητικού πυ ρήνα των πανεπιστημίων έναντι των άλλων λειτουργιών του και της γνωστικής και πνευματικής υπεροχής του διδακτικού προσωπικού έναντι των φοιτητών. Το πανεπιστήμιο λειτουργεί και ως φορέας κοινωνικοποίησης (Parsons and Platt 1973) σε μια κοινωνία αυτόνομων και ελεύθερων πολιτών που έχουν την ευθύ νη της ζωής τους και των συλλογικών αποφάσεων (ανοικτή κοινωνία). Η πανε πιστημιακή βασική έρευνα οδηγεί στην ανοικτή επιστήμη (Dasgupta and David 1994) που έχει ως κεντρική αξία και οργανωτική αρχή τη δημοσιότητα των απο τελεσμάτων: όποιος δημοσιεύει πρώτος μια επιστημονική δουλειά απολαμβάνει προαγωγές, οικονομική στήριξη και την αναγνώριση των συναδέλφων του.…”
Section: πανεπιστήμιο και κριτική σκέψηunclassified