The American Society of Clinical Oncology–endorsed American Society for Radiation Oncology Evidence-Based Guideline of stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non–small cell lung cancer: An expert opinion
Abstract:Feature Editor's Note-After reading this Feature Expert Opinion, it should be more evident than ever that lobectomy is the current standard of care for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are medically fit for operation. It is common, however, for fit patients with stage I NSCLC to perceive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as an attractive option for the treatment of their disease. SBRT is a noninvasive, well-tolerated outpatient procedure, and the Internet is replete with favorab… Show more
“…For stage I disease, a 5-year survival rate of 75–80% can be obtained after successful surgery [ 1 ]. Radiosurgery can be performed, achieving comparable efficacy to surgery using the latest linear accelerator (LINAC) [ 30 ]. Stage II lung cancer is reached when the cancer has metastasized to the hilar lymph node (N1) or when it is a large tumor without lymphatic metastases (T2b-3N0).…”
The health burden of cancer increases in Uzbekistan as the country develops and the life expectancy increases. Management of such a burden requires efficient screening, treatment optimization, and investigation of the causes of cancer. The Ministry of Health of Uzbekistan formed an advisory consortium, including clinical oncology and healthcare management experts from Uzbekistan and South Korea, to design a strategy for cancer management. Our consortium has analyzed six cancer types with high morbidity and mortality in Uzbekistan by classifying them into three categories (breast, cervical (gynecologic cancers), lung, liver (cancer common in men), stomach, and colorectal cancers (gastrointestinal cancers)). Lung and liver cancers are common causes of death in men after middle age—they can yield a serious health burden on the country and ruin the livelihood of families. In this review, we will analyze the oncologic literature and suggest practical recommendations for the treatment and prevention of lung and liver cancer in Uzbekistan. Data from South Korea, which has conducted nationwide screening for two decades and made progress in improving prognosis, will be discussed as a comparative control.
“…For stage I disease, a 5-year survival rate of 75–80% can be obtained after successful surgery [ 1 ]. Radiosurgery can be performed, achieving comparable efficacy to surgery using the latest linear accelerator (LINAC) [ 30 ]. Stage II lung cancer is reached when the cancer has metastasized to the hilar lymph node (N1) or when it is a large tumor without lymphatic metastases (T2b-3N0).…”
The health burden of cancer increases in Uzbekistan as the country develops and the life expectancy increases. Management of such a burden requires efficient screening, treatment optimization, and investigation of the causes of cancer. The Ministry of Health of Uzbekistan formed an advisory consortium, including clinical oncology and healthcare management experts from Uzbekistan and South Korea, to design a strategy for cancer management. Our consortium has analyzed six cancer types with high morbidity and mortality in Uzbekistan by classifying them into three categories (breast, cervical (gynecologic cancers), lung, liver (cancer common in men), stomach, and colorectal cancers (gastrointestinal cancers)). Lung and liver cancers are common causes of death in men after middle age—they can yield a serious health burden on the country and ruin the livelihood of families. In this review, we will analyze the oncologic literature and suggest practical recommendations for the treatment and prevention of lung and liver cancer in Uzbekistan. Data from South Korea, which has conducted nationwide screening for two decades and made progress in improving prognosis, will be discussed as a comparative control.
“…According to the American Society of Clinical Oncologists [30] , for patients with standard operative risk (1.5% mortality rate) and Stage I NSCLC, SBRT is not recommended as an alternative to surgery outside clinical trials. The standard operative risk reached 4.4% in patients aged 81 years or more, even though age, sex, cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidities, and patients' functional status are factors influencing peri-operative risk.…”
Surgical resection is treatment of choice for early stage non-small cell lung cancer, even though 20%-30% of patients do not undergo surgery. Compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has demonstrated excellent local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). Central and ultracentral lesions present higher toxicity rates after SBRT because of their proximity to mediastinal structures. Dose escalation studies have documented that 10-12 Gy per fraction is the maximal tolerable dose with acceptable rates of treatment adverse events and survival. Peripheral lesions can be safely treated with high radiotherapy dose (biologically equivalent dose of ≥ 150 Gy) and a different SBRT dose schedule has showed comparable results with LC rates > 90% and OS comparable to surgical resection. Elderly patients, defined as 75 years or older, are a subgroup of patients who may benefit the most from SBRT, as they have higher morbidity and mortality risks because of comorbidities and decreased lung function. At present, there are no randomized studies comparing SBRT with surgery for patients who are potential candidates for surgical removal. Retrospective studies and systematic reviews have showed encouraging results in terms of cancer-specific survival and LC.
“…Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective therapy for early-stage, node-negative, medically inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Dose-fractionation schemes usually depend on tumor size and location and have been largely standardized by current guidelines [1][2][3][4]. However, after irradiation, about 10-15% of the tumors will recur locally and up to 50% of the patients will experience systemic disease progression despite PET-based staging before SBRT [5].…”
Objectives: To generate and validate a state-of-the-art radiomics model for prediction of radiation-induced lung injury and oncologic outcome in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).Methods: A radiomics model was generated from the planning CT images of 110 patients with primary, inoperable stage I/IIa NSCLC who were treated with robotic SBRT using a risk-adapted fractionation scheme at the University Hospital Cologne (training cohort). In total, 851 radiomic features fulfilling the standards of the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI) were extracted from the outlined gross tumor volume (GTV) and used to build a model for prediction of local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and development of local lung fibrosis (LF) by means of a gradient-boosted ensemble of regression trees. In addition, predictive clinical and dosimetric parameters were identified from a standard univariate Cox regression analysis. The radiomics model was validated in a comparable cohort of 71 patients treated by robotic SBRT at the Radiosurgery Center in Northern Germany (test cohort).Results: Oncologic outcome did not differ between the two cohorts (OS at 36 months 56% vs. 43%, p=0.065; median DFS 25 months vs. 23 months, p=0.43; LC at 36 months 90% vs. 93%, p=0.197). Local lung fibrosis developed in 33% vs. 35% of the patients (p=0.75), all events were observed within 36 months. In the training cohort, the radiomics model was able to distinguish low-risk from high risk patients for OS, DFS, LC and LF with a high accuracy (p < 0.001). In the test cohort, the model for development of lung fibrosis retained its predictive power and could differentiate patients with a high risk for developing LF from those with a low risk (p=0.016). In contrast, the radiomics model failed to predict OS, DFS and LC in the test cohort. Also, none of the clinical and dosimetric parameters predictive for development of LF in the training cohort (GTV-Dmean, GTV-Dmax, PTV-D95%, Lung-D1ml, age) had a significant impact on the occurrence of LF in the test cohort.Conclusion: Despite the obvious difficulties in generalizing predictive models for oncologic outcome and toxicity, this analysis shows that a carefully designed radiomics model for prediction of local lung fibrosis after SBRT of early stage lung cancer performs well across different institutions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.