1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00871958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The American marketing association code of ethics: Instructions for marketers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of practical application, a review (as of August 1, 2003) of several national directors' associations including the United States' National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), Britain's Institute of Directors (IoD), and Canada's Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD), did not find any offering training that specifically addressed the ethical as opposed to legal obligations of directors. These findings might appear surprising given the extensive literature discussing the ethical obligations of other non-professional groups including: marketing managers (O'Boyle and Dawson, 1992); public relations managers (Bivins, 1993;Pratt, 1991Pratt, , 1994; project managers (Nixon, 1987); scientists (Rapoport, 1989;Schinin, 1989); bank managers (Rideout, 1989); real estate agents (Allmon, 1990); property managers (Sharplin et al, 1992); purchasing professionals (Forker, 1990); property/liability underwriters (Cooper and Frank, 1990); financial managers (Ang, 1993;Freeman et al, 1992;Nemes, 1992); and computer professionals (Oz, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In terms of practical application, a review (as of August 1, 2003) of several national directors' associations including the United States' National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), Britain's Institute of Directors (IoD), and Canada's Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD), did not find any offering training that specifically addressed the ethical as opposed to legal obligations of directors. These findings might appear surprising given the extensive literature discussing the ethical obligations of other non-professional groups including: marketing managers (O'Boyle and Dawson, 1992); public relations managers (Bivins, 1993;Pratt, 1991Pratt, , 1994; project managers (Nixon, 1987); scientists (Rapoport, 1989;Schinin, 1989); bank managers (Rideout, 1989); real estate agents (Allmon, 1990); property managers (Sharplin et al, 1992); purchasing professionals (Forker, 1990); property/liability underwriters (Cooper and Frank, 1990); financial managers (Ang, 1993;Freeman et al, 1992;Nemes, 1992); and computer professionals (Oz, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Deontology refers to the evaluation of the inherent good or bad of the action itself, rather than the value or consequences it brings (Clark and Dawson, 1996), constituting the judgment that one's behavior is right or obligatory. Conversely, teleology evaluates the consequences of human behavior and assesses the value of meeting personal interests or social/economic obligations (O'Boyle and Dawson, 1992). The function of teleology is concerned with that ethical good or right is also necessary for the self (Bergman, 2004).…”
Section: Organizational Ethical Climate and Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether by formal design or informal methods, a firm's ethical climate is a socializing mechanism that instills employees with its mores and values (Ferrell and Gresham, 1985;Kelley and Elm, 2003). The resulting practices seek conformity among agents in exchange for meeting their social, financial, and other personal needs (O'Boyle and Dawson, 1992). Continued reinforcement of these norms occurs through explicit and implicit outcome expectancies that the company conveys to its members (Wright, 1995).…”
Section: Morality Marketing and Business Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marketing Association posits a middle ground, defining such relations through the principle of equivalence and its two-part set of obligations for both sellers and buyers (O'Boyle and Dawson, 1992). These responsibilities require that exchange partners trade items of equal value that impose burdens of equal cost.…”
Section: Alison Watkins and Ronald Paul Hillmentioning
confidence: 99%