Editage Insights
DOI: 10.34193/ei-a-5840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The American Chemical Society to launch a chemistry preprint server

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the localization of GRB 050724 Prochaska et al 2006) and most likely GRB 050509b Bloom et al 2006) to bright elliptical galaxies, the lack of supernova emission in several lowredshift short GRBs (Hjorth et al 2005a;Fox et al 2005;Bloom et al 2006;Soderberg et al 2006), and the location of GRB 050709 outside of any star-forming region in its host galaxy ( Fox et al 2005). While this supports the popular notion that the progenitors are compact object binaries (DNS or NS-BH; e.g., Eichler et al 1989;Narayan et al 1992;Rosswog et al 2003), the lack of direct observations (e.g., gravitational waves or a subrelativistic, radioactive component: Li & Paczyński 1998;Kulkarni 2005) suggests that a more detailed understanding of the progenitor population has to rely on statistical studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These include the localization of GRB 050724 Prochaska et al 2006) and most likely GRB 050509b Bloom et al 2006) to bright elliptical galaxies, the lack of supernova emission in several lowredshift short GRBs (Hjorth et al 2005a;Fox et al 2005;Bloom et al 2006;Soderberg et al 2006), and the location of GRB 050709 outside of any star-forming region in its host galaxy ( Fox et al 2005). While this supports the popular notion that the progenitors are compact object binaries (DNS or NS-BH; e.g., Eichler et al 1989;Narayan et al 1992;Rosswog et al 2003), the lack of direct observations (e.g., gravitational waves or a subrelativistic, radioactive component: Li & Paczyński 1998;Kulkarni 2005) suggests that a more detailed understanding of the progenitor population has to rely on statistical studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…4 is the toy model of LP98 (cf. Kulkarni 2005; ), calculated assuming an electron scattering opacity and an ‘ f ’ value = 3 × 10 −6 , as calibrated to match the radioactive heating rate in . Fig.…”
Section: Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Bolometric light curve of the radioactively powered transients from NS–NS/NS–BH mergers, calculated assuming a total ejecta mass M tot = 10 −2 M ⊙ with electron fraction Y e = 0.1 and mean outflow speed v ≃ 0.1 c , and for two values of the thermalization efficiency (), ε therm = 1 (solid line) and ε therm = 0.5 (dotted line). Also shown for comparison (dashed line) is a one‐zone calculation based on the LP98 model (as implemented in Kulkarni 2005; Metzger et al 2008b) assuming f = 3 × 10 −6 (see ) and the same values for M tot and v . …”
Section: Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Winds driven from deep within the BH potential well could produce relativistic jets and power late‐time central engine activity. Outflows driven from larger radii dominate the system's mass loss and may power supernova‐like optical transients through the decay of radioactive isotopes that are synthesized in the wind (Li & Paczyński 1998; Kulkarni 2005). In both cases, the mass‐loss rate and nuclear composition are critical for determining the observable signature.…”
Section: Disc Windsmentioning
confidence: 99%