2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2976174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ambivalent Role of Religion for Sustainable Development: A Review of the Empirical Evidence

Abstract: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 294 publications
(266 reference statements)
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, research from primarily environmental sociology and psychology has shown that religious orientations play an important role in sustainability issues (for overviews cf. Tomalin et al 2019;Jenkins et al 2018;Basedau et al 2017;Ronan 2017;Sachdeva 2016;Haluza-DeLay 2014;Tucker 2006), although the connections are by no means clear. Whether religious orientations positively or negatively affect the formation of a sustainable environmental orientation depends on many personal and contextual factors, and not least, on the respective religious orientation itself (Baugh 2019;Ives and Kidwell 2019;Basedau et al 2017;Pater and Dankelman 2009;Sherkat and Ellison 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, research from primarily environmental sociology and psychology has shown that religious orientations play an important role in sustainability issues (for overviews cf. Tomalin et al 2019;Jenkins et al 2018;Basedau et al 2017;Ronan 2017;Sachdeva 2016;Haluza-DeLay 2014;Tucker 2006), although the connections are by no means clear. Whether religious orientations positively or negatively affect the formation of a sustainable environmental orientation depends on many personal and contextual factors, and not least, on the respective religious orientation itself (Baugh 2019;Ives and Kidwell 2019;Basedau et al 2017;Pater and Dankelman 2009;Sherkat and Ellison 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomalin et al 2019;Jenkins et al 2018;Basedau et al 2017;Ronan 2017;Sachdeva 2016;Haluza-DeLay 2014;Tucker 2006), although the connections are by no means clear. Whether religious orientations positively or negatively affect the formation of a sustainable environmental orientation depends on many personal and contextual factors, and not least, on the respective religious orientation itself (Baugh 2019;Ives and Kidwell 2019;Basedau et al 2017;Pater and Dankelman 2009;Sherkat and Ellison 2007). Hardly any specific empirical evidence is available for this concerning young people, and despite empirical research on sustainability awareness among young people (Gifford and Nilsson 2014), the effects of religious orientations remain largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a better understanding of the classification of the SDGs please compare Table A1 in the online appendix and refer to Basedau et al . ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The majority of studies in this filed are often correlational and causal effect cannot be directly inferred (Basedau et al 2017;H. Koenig et al 2012;Liu et al 2011aLiu et al , 2011b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still ongoing controversy about the causal effect of religion on health outcome due to major concerns about self-selection bias (Cragun et al 2016;Zimmer et al 2016;Idler et al 2017) People with greater propensities to be religious may also be good at health maintenance (Chiswick and Mirtcheva 2013;Doane and Elliott 2016;Koenig et al 2012;Levin 1994). Likewise, people who are sick or in poor health may also be more likely to practice religion for comfort or buffering effect (Basedau et al 2017;Inglehart and Norris 2004;Steptoe et al 2015;Doane and Elliott 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%