The ambiguities of performance-based governance reforms in Italy: Reviving the fortunes of evaluation and performance measurement

Marra, Mita

doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.006

Cited by 24 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Considerando a Marra 135 , se identifican distintos puntos de vista sobre las mediciones de impacto en el sector público; las mediciones de impacto son de vital importancia porque muestra en qué medida se han conseguido los resultados deseados y en qué aspectos se debe mejorar, lo anterior desde una perspectiva general sobre las evaluaciones de impacto.…”

Section: 25unclassified

Evaluating standards-based assessment rubrics in a postgraduate public health subject

Kite

Phongsavan

2016

Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

LISTA DE CUADROS pág. Cuadro 1. Metodología Cuadro 2. Criterios de revisión de la literatura Cuadro 3. Artículos pertinentes para la revisión de la literatura Cuadro 4. Documentos por año Cuadro 5. Documentos por país Cuadro 6. Tipos de documento Cuadro 7. Documentos por área temática Cuadro 8. Palabras clave por función sustantiva Cuadro 9. Ecuación de búsqueda (Docencia) Cuadro 10. Ecuación de búsqueda (Investigación) Cuadro 11. Ecuación de búsqueda (Extensión) Cuadro 12.Ecuaciones de búsqueda Cuadro 13. Artículos por función sustantiva Cuadro 14. Elementos claves de docencia Cuadro 15. Elementos claves de la función de extensión Cuadro 16. Ficha técnica indicador de deserción Cuadro 17. Ficha técnica indicador ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje (AVA) Cuadro 18. Ficha técnica indicador rendimiento académico Cuadro 19. Ficha técnica indicador plan de estudios Cuadro 20. Ficha técnica indicador de retroalimentación Cuadro 21. Ficha técnica indicador de evaluación de procesos Cuadro 22. Ficha técnica indicador de aprendizaje Cuadro 23. Ficha técnica de indicador de estrategias de aprendizaje Cuadro 24. Ficha técnica de indicador de enseñanza Cuadro 25. Ficha técnica de indicador de formación Cuadro 26. Ficha técnica de indicador de emprendimiento Cuadro 27. Ficha técnica de indicador de triple hélice Cuadro 28. Ficha técnica indicador de egresados Cuadro 29. Ficha técnica indicador de mercado laboral Cuadro 30. Ficha técnica indicador de responsabilidad social Cuadro 31. Ficha técnica indicador de educación continuada Cuadro 32. Ficha técnica indicador de empleo Cuadro 33. Ficha técnica indicador de educación empresarial Cuadro 34. Ficha técnica indicador desempleo Cuadro 35. Ficha técnica indicador del personal Cuadro 36. Ficha técnica indicador de equipos Cuadro 37. Ficha técnica indicador de patentes Cuadro 38. Ficha técnica indicador de laboratorios Cuadro 39. Ficha técnica indicador de biblioteca Cuadro 40. Ficha técnica indicador de sociedad Cuadro 41. Ficha técnica indicador de producción científica pág. Cuadro 42. Ficha técnica indicador de innovación tecnológica Cuadro 43. Ficha técnica indicador de perspectivas laborales Cuadro 44. Ficha técnica indicador de segundo idioma Cuadro 45. Ficha técnica indicador de investigadores extranjeros Cuadro 46. Ficha técnica indicador de movilidad de los investigadores Cuadro 47. Ficha técnica indicador de becas Cuadro 48. Ficha técnica indicador de internacionalización del personal Cuadro 49. Ficha técnica de indicador de investigación avanzada Cuadro 50. Ficha técnica indicador de estudiantes internacionales

show abstract

Section: 25unclassified

Evaluating standards-based assessment rubrics in a postgraduate public health subject

Kite

Phongsavan

2016

Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Building upon these findings (see also Marra, 2017Marra, , 2019, I provide behavioral insights on Italy's performance regimes and suggest a behavioral design to reform Italy's evaluation policy (James et al, 2020;Regonini, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 86%

A Behavioral Design to Reform Italy’s Evaluation Policy

Marra

2021

American Journal of Evaluation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drawing on the extensive ethnographic research I conducted on Italy’s performance evaluation system, this article highlights the cognitive biases associated with evidence use in decision making and institution working. Framing effects, status quo bias, motivated reasoning, and tacit conflicts between personal and organizational interests were only some of the behavioral phenomena policy makers, managers, and evaluators showed to limit their exposure to performance information. Integrating behavioral findings with theories of governance, evaluation utilization, and critical evidence–informed policymaking, this article discusses behavioral reform strategies to overcome (i) tacit conflicts of interests among evaluators, (ii) the compliance mentality with performance assessment among managers, and (iii) adversarial relationships between courts and administrative agencies as well as polarized politics with respect to evidence use and experts’ behavior. A behavioral design is relevant to reform evaluation policies, especially in countries where performance regimes have been criticized, contested, resisted, and/or perceived as red tape and surveillance mechanisms.

show abstract

“…From the researcher's study and depend on the literature reviews, they noticed that there are many barriers facing e-government during implementation in many countries that are related to the organizational dimensions according to the studies of ( Marra, 2018), pointed out that one of the mass barrier that is related to this part which is the lack of organizational strategic plan, that includes the future vision of the organization via long and short term plans. As well as (Kumaraswamy & Quamar, 2018;Marra, 2018;Fox, et al, 2019), noticed that the lack and nonappearance of government coordination is one of the other obstacles that are facing implementation process in this field. In the other side (Kumar, et al, 2018;Hatsu & Ngassam, 2015;Abdelkader, 2015), illustrate that the culture objectives as lack of corruption avoidance, transparency and fair-mindedness in process, consumer support, that affect directly on the relationship between citizen and government.…”

Section: Barriers To E-government and Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Organizational Barriers which are Facing Electronic Government Implementation: The Electronic Government Implementation Framework

Saleh

Nakshabandi

Zeebaree

et al. 2021

EEA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Investigating e-government specified a few organizational barriers to e-government implementation. This paper proposes a framework for examining how organizational barriers affect the application of e-government. Frame creation depends on three main organizational dimensions. First, the organizational main dimensions, which are related to the culture of the organization, include (control system, strategic direction, integration, and coordination). Second, the organizational main dimensions which are related to the structure of the organization include (adaptability, involvement, integration, agreement, reword, and incentive system). Third, the organizational main dimensions, which are related to Information Technology, include (information transfer, Communication, end-user focus, and employee learning). We initiate those organizational obstacles which are recognized in major electronic government literature linked to the organizational culture effectiveness and dimensions. The conclusion is that the framework is related to understand organizational barriers which prompt the implementation of electronic government. This research is limited to the framework that has been developed based on the lens of e-government literature in the application theory. It is now necessary to test this model in different contexts. This study tries to demonstrate that key that impedes the factors that are associated with the implementation and enhancement of the e-government system. There must be more attention to the progress made in e-government projects quickly and accurately. Thus, there is a strong commitment on the part of each government to implement e-government services.

show abstract

The ambiguities of performance-based governance reforms in Italy: Reviving the fortunes of evaluation and performance measurement

Cited by 24 publications

References 23 publications

Evaluating standards-based assessment rubrics in a postgraduate public health subject

Evaluating standards-based assessment rubrics in a postgraduate public health subject

A Behavioral Design to Reform Italy’s Evaluation Policy

Organizational Barriers which are Facing Electronic Government Implementation: The Electronic Government Implementation Framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About