1960
DOI: 10.2307/3209193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Amarna Letters and the Amarna Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Near East during the 2 nd millennium BC is a particularly promising arena to explore many of the questions targeting mobility patterns and effects, as it has often been discussed as an era of high levels of interregional connectivity in areas such as trade, diplomacy, and artistic expression, documented by both the material and textual records [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The wide-ranging social, cultural, and economic contacts of this period have long been understood to involve high levels of individual mobility on a broad scale and across a wide area, as the exchange and movement of traders, artisans, and representatives of kings is well documented [9][10][11][12][13]. However, there have been limited studies of individuals' life histories and broader demographic trends during this time period which are based in bioarchaeology, particularly in the Levant (though much of the isotopic work done on humans has been in both earlier and later periods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]; for 3 rd millennium BC Mesopotamia, see also [26]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Near East during the 2 nd millennium BC is a particularly promising arena to explore many of the questions targeting mobility patterns and effects, as it has often been discussed as an era of high levels of interregional connectivity in areas such as trade, diplomacy, and artistic expression, documented by both the material and textual records [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The wide-ranging social, cultural, and economic contacts of this period have long been understood to involve high levels of individual mobility on a broad scale and across a wide area, as the exchange and movement of traders, artisans, and representatives of kings is well documented [9][10][11][12][13]. However, there have been limited studies of individuals' life histories and broader demographic trends during this time period which are based in bioarchaeology, particularly in the Levant (though much of the isotopic work done on humans has been in both earlier and later periods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]; for 3 rd millennium BC Mesopotamia, see also [26]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Near East during the second millennium BC is a particularly promising arena to explore many of the questions targeting mobility patterns and effects, as it has often been discussed as an era of high levels of international connectivity in areas such as trade, diplomacy, and artistic expression, documented by both the material and textual records [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The wide-ranging social, cultural, and economic contacts of this period have long been understood to involve high levels of individual mobility on a broad scale and across a wide area, as the exchange and movement of traders, artisans, and representatives of kings is well-documented [9][10][11][12][13]. However, there have been limited direct studies of life history and broader demographic trends during this time period, particularly in the Levant (where much of the isotopic work done on humans has been in later periods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]), limiting the degree to which this can be effectively tested, although isotopic work done in second millennium BC contexts in Egypt [21,22], Crete [23,24], Greece [25,26], Anatolia [27,28], and Arabia [29] have indicated differing levels of individual mobility ranging from populations composed primarily of local individuals to those with very high levels of non-locals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%