2008
DOI: 10.1080/00207160701455894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The alternating group explicit (AGE) iterative method for solving a Ladyzhenskaya model for stationary incompressible viscous flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This table shows the discrete L 2 norm ψ * − ψ L 2 where ψ denotes the computational solution on an n×n grid (h=1/n) and ψ * is the exact solution. It is observed that the results behave in similar manner as in [6].…”
Section: Numerical Experimentation and Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This table shows the discrete L 2 norm ψ * − ψ L 2 where ψ denotes the computational solution on an n×n grid (h=1/n) and ψ * is the exact solution. It is observed that the results behave in similar manner as in [6].…”
Section: Numerical Experimentation and Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…We can also observe that the proposed preconditioned MEDG SOR scheme has shown considerable improvement in the number of iterations and execution time compared to that of the preconditioned scheme displayed in Ali and Saeed [13]. It is observed that our model problem is same as the problem in [6] when Re = 0 and ∈ 1 = 0 in Eq. (2).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentation and Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus of this study is the efficient solution to the linear system (12). This linear system (12) is nonsymmetric and indefinite.…”
Section: For Any Choice Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterative solutions of systems of the form (12) can be found using a variety of methods. In particular, Krylov subspace methods (see for example [6]) such as GMRES are applicable for such nonsymmetric systems (12). It is known that the performance of Krylov subspace methods is usually sensitive to the conditioning of the coefficient matrix and thus the idea of preconditioning must be implemented.…”
Section: For Any Choice Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%