The South Carolina cystic brosis (CF) newborn screening (NBS) program changed in 2019 to include CFTR genotyping for babies with top 4% immunoreactive trypsinogen, which improves sensitivity and timeliness, but increases carrier detection. Carrier identi cation has genetic implications for the family and parents of NBS+ babies have increased emotional distress. Genetic counseling (GC) may increase parent understanding and reduce anxiety yet is not uniformly offered at CF centers. We report our early results after implementing GC for NBS+ families at the time of sweat chloride testing (SCT). Sixteen mothers participated in an online survey about their experience. The child's pediatrician noti ed 10 (62.5%) of the NBS+ result. Parents felt they were noti ed in a timely manner (68.8%), by someone knowledgeable about NBS (62.5%), SCT (62.5%), CF (43.8%), and genetics (43.8%) and who cared about them (81.3%). Parents felt worried (81.3%), confused (81.3%), empowered (25%) and other (sad, shocked, scared, overwhelmed, devastated, defeated). Most (87.5%) sought additional information before SCT.Sadness and anxiety increased transiently with NBS+ result; bondedness with the baby was not affected. Nine mothers received GC with suggestion of reduced distress. Knowledge was high among both cohorts.GC was rated very helpful, informative, comforting, and minimally distracting. Data from this singlecenter study suggest bene t of GC and that families would value earlier contact with an expert. GC may potentially be taught via short course or online module(s) developed by GCs with CF expertise. Such undertakings and outcomes are areas for future study.This study was limited by small sample size at a single center, with GC provided by a single GC at the time of SCT, which limit power in statistical analyses and generalizability of ndings. A larger, multicenter study involving diverse settings, models and GCs would be informative. Ascertainment bias may exist. All participants were mothers and all had at least some college education, which may have impacted resource utilization and knowledge scores. Paternal experiences with CFNBS+ and GC are not known, and fathers are generally underrepresented in research (Bogossian et al., 2019). Although GC at SCT suggests potential reduced anxiety, the clinically meaningful change on the sadness, anxiety and bondedness measures is unknown. Emotional ratings also differed between GC+ and GC-groups before and after GC intervention; thus, the two groups may have other nonrandom differences. Recall bias is also possible.This study contributes to the understanding of parental CFNBS+ experience. Quality improvement initiatives may focus on result delivery, resources, timeline, and professionals involved. Continued engagement of GCs in CFNBS+ is recommended to optimize outcomes.
DeclarationsCompliance with Ethics Guidelines: All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki ...