2016
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE ALMA SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY IN THE HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD: CONTINUUM NUMBER COUNTS, RESOLVED 1.2 mm EXTRAGALACTIC BACKGROUND, AND PROPERTIES OF THE FAINTEST DUSTY STAR-FORMING GALAXIES

Abstract: We present an analysis of a deep (1σ=13 μJy) cosmological 1.2 mm continuum map based on ASPECS, the ALMA Spectroscopic Survey in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. In the 1 arcmin 2 covered by ASPECS we detect nine sources at s >3.5 significance at 1.2 mm. Our ALMA-selected sample has a median redshift of =  z 1.6 0.4, with only one galaxy detected at z>2 within the survey area. This value is significantly lower than that found in millimeter samples selected at a higher flux density cutoff and similar frequenci… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
118
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
(303 reference statements)
9
118
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7. Spectroscopic redshift distribution of the SMGs in our 870 μmsurvey compared to that for two faint 1.1 mm selected samples in the UDF from Aravena et al (2016) and Dunlop et al (2017; we note that the total number of sources for the distributions shown are not the same). These SMG samples have quite different selection functions and levels of incompleteness and so we do not draw any strong conclusions from the apparent differences between them, beyond noting that both distributions peak at relatively high redshifts, z 1.5 2.5 -, and reach out to z 5 with the more numerous ALESS 870 μmsample showing a more significant high-redshift tail beyond z 3 .…”
Section: Stacked Spectral Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Figure 7. Spectroscopic redshift distribution of the SMGs in our 870 μmsurvey compared to that for two faint 1.1 mm selected samples in the UDF from Aravena et al (2016) and Dunlop et al (2017; we note that the total number of sources for the distributions shown are not the same). These SMG samples have quite different selection functions and levels of incompleteness and so we do not draw any strong conclusions from the apparent differences between them, beyond noting that both distributions peak at relatively high redshifts, z 1.5 2.5 -, and reach out to z 5 with the more numerous ALESS 870 μmsample showing a more significant high-redshift tail beyond z 3 .…”
Section: Stacked Spectral Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Momentum injection is thought to be provided by radiation pressure produced on the dust grains. However, recent studies using deep Atacama Large Millimetre Array (ALMA) observations (Coppin et al 2015;Aravena et al 2016;Dunlop et al 2016) have shown that low-mass high-redshift galaxies have low dust content and the z = 4.88 arc does not appear heavily reddened (i.e. the continuum is bluer than that observed in the composite spectrum of Shapley et al 2003, see Fig.…”
Section: A Physical Picture For the Z = 488 Arcmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Aravena et al 2016;Bouwens et al 2016;Dunlop et al 2017). The buildup of the dust mass function suggests that (depending on the sensitivity) blind surveys are most likely to pick up galaxies with redshifts lower than three (see for example Figure 8 in Aravena et al (2016) and Figure 5 in Dunlop et al (2017)). We emphasise that our conclusion is based only on the dust mass of galaxies.…”
Section: The Evolution Of Dust Masses In Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%