2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-55573-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The allocation and value of time assigned to housework and child-care: An analysis for Switzerland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the 2001In general, the /2002In general, the (1991In general, the /1992 model explains 35% (37%) of the amount of housework done by women in partnerships. The explained variance of housework for men is much smaller than that observed for women, about 15% (12%), which is a common finding (e.g., Sousa-Poza et al 2001). …”
Section: Results For the Chronological Change In Houseworkmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the 2001In general, the /2002In general, the (1991In general, the /1992 model explains 35% (37%) of the amount of housework done by women in partnerships. The explained variance of housework for men is much smaller than that observed for women, about 15% (12%), which is a common finding (e.g., Sousa-Poza et al 2001). …”
Section: Results For the Chronological Change In Houseworkmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Hence, despite a slight reduction in the disparity of housework division between the sexes, a great amount of inequality still exists. This is a finding that can also be observed in other countries (e.g., Baxter 2002;Gershuny 1999;Sousa-Poza et al 2001;Sullivan 2000). Furthermore, there also appears to be some international evidence that while differences between genders are gradually getting smaller, this is primarily due to the relatively large decline in women's time spent on household work and less on men increasing their share (Baxter 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Some have argued that Tobit models are more appropriate in such circumstances, assuming a latent propensity to do an activity, and that negative values of this propensity are censored at zero (see for example Sousa-Poza et al 2001). Others counter that time spent in an activity cannot take values less than zero and that the observed zeroes that originally motivated the Tobit estimation strategy such as whether or not consumer goods were bought, are different from the zeroes observed in time diary data (Wight et al 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The use of OLS has been debated in time use research because of the sometimes large number of zeros in the dependent variables arising when individuals record no time in an activity. Some argue that Tobit models are more appropriate in these circumstances, assuming a latent propensity to do an activity, and that negative values of this propensity are artificially censored at zero in the measure (see for example Sousa-Poza et al, 2001). Others counter that time spent in an activity cannot take values less than zero, that zero values in the dependent variable reflect actual and natural nonparticipation, and that OLS is therefore preferable to Tobit (see for example (Stewart, 2009).…”
Section: Analysis Planmentioning
confidence: 96%