2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002220000063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The algebraic torus theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique described in this paper can also be applied to obtain a new proof of the following generalisation of Stallings' theorem which was known to Dunwoody and Roller [6]; it plays a key role in the proof of the algebraic torus theorem [7]. The result was (re)proved in [10] by appealing to Dunwoody's result on cuts in graphs [4].…”
Section: Theorem (Dunwoody)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique described in this paper can also be applied to obtain a new proof of the following generalisation of Stallings' theorem which was known to Dunwoody and Roller [6]; it plays a key role in the proof of the algebraic torus theorem [7]. The result was (re)proved in [10] by appealing to Dunwoody's result on cuts in graphs [4].…”
Section: Theorem (Dunwoody)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is immediate from Theorem 3.11 and Theorem 4.2, which says one can read any almost invariant set over a VPC n subgroup in a JSJ tree T , and which follows from [Dunwoody and Swenson 2000] and [Scott and Swarup 2003, Theorem 8.2].…”
Section: The Regular Neighborhood Of Scott and Swarupmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Theorem 4.2 is essentially another take on the proof of Scott and Swarup's [2003, Theorem 8.2], and makes a crucial use of algebraic torus theorems of [Dunwoody and Swenson 2000;Dunwoody and Roller 1993]. We give a proof in Section 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By theorem 49 there is a hyperbolic element g in V with {g ∞ , g −∞ } = {a, b}. By the algebraic torus theorem [11] to show that G splits over a 2-ended group it suffices to show that X/ < g > has more than one end. LetX = X ∪∂X.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%